> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> This patch fixes bug 1694, which is a crash when two buffer
Jean-Marc> are open and the first one is closed. This is due to a
Jean-Marc> problem with cursor initialization which the attached patch
Jean-Marc> fixes.
I
> "Braunstein" == Braunstein Alfredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Braunstein> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> This patch fixes bug 1694, which is a crash when two buffer are
>> open and the first one is closed. This is due to a problem with
>> cursor initialization which the attached patch fixes
Angus Leeming wrote:
> but what happens (in the future) when we have two or more buffer
> views? I don't think that your solution scales very well...
I don't see a scaling problem in my solution, could you elaborate?
Open doc1 -> bv1
Open doc2 -> bv2
Open another view of doc1 -> bv3
...
etc
The
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
> | This problem (and others) would be automatically solved IMO if we decide
> | to keep different BufferViews for every open buffer (and show the active
> | one/hide the others).
>
> How did we resolve the "several view of the same buffer" prob when we
> last had that
Braunstein Alfredo wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> This patch fixes bug 1694, which is a crash when two buffer are
>> open and the first one is closed. This is due to a problem with
>> cursor initialization which the attached patch fixes.
>>
>> There is a problem however I do not know
Braunstein Alfredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> This patch fixes bug 1694, which is a crash when two buffer are open
>> and the first one is closed. This is due to a problem with cursor
>> initialization which the attached patch fixes.
>>
>> There is a problem ho
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This patch fixes bug 1694, which is a crash when two buffer are open
> and the first one is closed. This is due to a problem with cursor
> initialization which the attached patch fixes.
>
> There is a problem however I do not know how to solve: when switching
> buffe
This patch fixes bug 1694, which is a crash when two buffer are open
and the first one is closed. This is due to a problem with cursor
initialization which the attached patch fixes.
There is a problem however I do not know how to solve: when switching
buffer of closing a buffer, the cursor is res
