Re: [patch] Boost 1.34 name clash

2006-09-15 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Enrico> On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 01:55:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Enrico> wrote: >> > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Enrico> Here is the patch. Please tell me if I can put it in. >> If it is ne

Re: [patch] Boost 1.34 name clash

2006-09-15 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 01:55:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Enrico> Here is the patch. Please tell me if I can put it in. > > If it is needed for 1.4, you can put it in there. This is related to boost filesystem 1.34

Re: [patch] Boost 1.34 name clash

2006-09-15 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Enrico> Here is the patch. Please tell me if I can put it in. If it is needed for 1.4, you can put it in there. JMarc

Re: [patch] Boost 1.34 name clash

2006-09-12 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 07:31:16PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 06:01:12PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | > Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > > | > | # define BOOST_FS_FUNC(BOOST_FS_TYPE)

Re: [patch] Boost 1.34 name clash

2006-09-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 06:01:12PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | # define BOOST_FS_FUNC(BOOST_FS_TYPE) inline BOOST_FS_TYPE | > | # define BOOST_INLINE_FS_FUNC(BOOST_FS_TYPE) inline

Re: [patch] Boost 1.34 name clash

2006-09-12 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 06:01:12PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | # define BOOST_FS_FUNC(BOOST_FS_TYPE) inline BOOST_FS_TYPE > | # define BOOST_INLINE_FS_FUNC(BOOST_FS_TYPE) inline BOOST_FS_TYPE > | typedef boost::filesystem::path Pa

Re: [patch] Boost 1.34 name clash

2006-09-12 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 03:59:16PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The problem occurs when BOOST_FILESYSTEM_NARROW_ONLY is defined as > > in this case the "typedef boost::filesystem::path Path;" kicks in. > > I'd say that you've found a bug in the Bo

Re: [patch] Boost 1.34 name clash

2006-09-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | # define BOOST_FS_FUNC(BOOST_FS_TYPE) inline BOOST_FS_TYPE | # define BOOST_INLINE_FS_FUNC(BOOST_FS_TYPE) inline BOOST_FS_TYPE | typedef boost::filesystem::path Path; | # define BOOST_FS_TYPENAME | # endif | | The problem occurs when BOOST

Re: [patch] Boost 1.34 name clash

2006-09-12 Thread Angus Leeming
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The problem occurs when BOOST_FILESYSTEM_NARROW_ONLY is defined as > in this case the "typedef boost::filesystem::path Path;" kicks in. I'd say that you've found a bug in the Boost code. Library code shouldn't pollute the global namespace in this wa

[patch] Boost 1.34 name clash

2006-09-12 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On cygwin, when compiling lyx_cb.C and a few other files, I get the following error: if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src -I. -I../../boost -Wno-uninitialized -O2 -MT lyx_cb.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/lyx_cb.Tpo" -c -o lyx_cb.o ../../src/lyx_cb.C; \ then mv -f ".deps/lyx_cb.Tpo" ".deps/ly

Re: [BOOST patch]: boost format fix.

2004-03-30 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | No reason other than I thought you wanted all boost changes to go | through you. It is more that I need to be aware of them. -- Lgb

Re: [BOOST patch]: boost format fix.

2004-03-29 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Lars, this one liner fixes a bug in the boost format library which > | is otherwise completely broken on a 64 bit machine. The patch has > | been rolled into the boost cvs tree by its maintainer already. > Yes, I saw the message. Nice work. > | Can I get you to appl

Re: [BOOST patch]: boost format fix.

2004-03-29 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars, this one liner fixes a bug in the boost format library which is | otherwise completely broken on a 64 bit machine. The patch has been | rolled into the boost cvs tree by its maintainer already. Yes, I saw the message. Nice work. | Can I get you t

[BOOST patch]: boost format fix.

2004-03-27 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars, this one liner fixes a bug in the boost format library which is otherwise completely broken on a 64 bit machine. The patch has been rolled into the boost cvs tree by its maintainer already. Can I get you to apply it to the lyx boost tree please? -- AngusIndex: boost/boost/format/internals.

Re: [patch]: boost any

2003-10-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Angus Leeming wrote: >> Lars, could I get you to apply this/contact the boost list as you >> see fit? > | Thanks for doing that Lars. I see that the change has been committed | and have noted the comment about including the appropriate header. > | I'll

Re: [patch]: boost any

2003-10-07 Thread Angus Leeming
Angus Leeming wrote: > Lars, could I get you to apply this/contact the boost list as you > see fit? Thanks for doing that Lars. I see that the change has been committed and have noted the comment about including the appropriate header. I'll commit the changes to the lyx tree. -- Angus

[patch]: boost any

2003-10-06 Thread Angus Leeming
As discussed. Lars, could I get you to apply this/contact the boost list as you see fit? I note that there are a total of 34 throws in the boost libs $ grep -r 'throw ' boost | grep -c -v ChangeLog -- AngusIndex: boost/ChangeLog =

Re: [patch] boost/string

2003-06-30 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 04:27:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | I'd consider the current boost code a bug. | > | > agree. | > | > | After all, it is templatized on Char/Traits, yet uses a v

Re: [patch] boost/string

2003-06-30 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 04:27:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | I'd consider the current boost code a bug. > > agree. > > | After all, it is templatized on Char/Traits, yet uses a value coming > | from a (possibly) different instantiation.

Re: [patch] boost/string

2003-06-30 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I'd consider the current boost code a bug. agree. | After all, it is templatized on Char/Traits, yet uses a value coming | from a (possibly) different instantiation. I have the same changes in my code. -- Lgb

[patch] boost/string

2003-06-30 Thread Andre Poenitz
I'd consider the current boost code a bug. After all, it is templatized on Char/Traits, yet uses a value coming from a (possibly) different instantiation. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson

[Patch]: boost assert calls

2002-07-30 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars, as promised, here it is again. Angus Index: boost/ChangeLog === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/boost/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 1.26 diff -u -p -r1.26 ChangeLog --- boost/ChangeLog 28 Jul 2002 23:38:36 - 1

[PATCH]: boost

2002-06-12 Thread Angus Leeming
* Fixes a warning on a 64 bit machine (pointers being of size 8 and ints of size 4...) * Enables compilation of a templatised function with this compiler (and appears to be the right fix anyhow.) Ok to apply? Angus Index: boost/ChangeLog ==

PATCH: boost/.cvsignore

2001-02-16 Thread Angus Leeming
A trivial patch to some .cvsignore files in boost/ Index: boost/.cvsignore === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/boost/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.3 .cvsignore --- boost/.cvsignore2001/02/13 15:33:29