On Tuesday 01 October 2002 12:46 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:17:54PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I was under the impression that we were allowing the direct
> > entry of GlueLengths but were forcing LyXLengths to be
> > always valid. Is that not the case?
>
> It's not th
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:17:54PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I was under the impression that we were allowing the direct
> entry of GlueLengths but were forcing LyXLengths to be always
> valid. Is that not the case?
It's not the case, I bellieve. Entering "3in" is quicker for the power
use
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 11:48 am, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > This trivial patch allows input of doubles only rather than
> > complaining about non-doubles.
>
> But you know that this disables direct inserting of
> lenght+unit ("3in")?
I was under the impression that
Angus Leeming wrote:
> This trivial patch allows input of doubles only rather than
> complaining about non-doubles.
But you know that this disables direct inserting of lenght+unit ("3in")?
Jürgen.
This trivial patch allows input of doubles only rather than
complaining about non-doubles.
Ok to apply?
Angus
Index: src/frontends/xforms/FormWrap.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/frontends/xforms/FormWrap.C,v