On Thursday 15 August 2002 11:08 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Ahhh. I'd forgotten about that. Did you manage to isolate the problem and
> | tell boost the list about it?
>
> No.
Well then, the trick is to replace
static boost::signal0 some_signal;
with a static method returning a r
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 14 August 2002 11:03 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I think this is a step in the right direction, and it is surely not
>> worse than the thingie I did.
>
| Sure, but I think that the implementation is horrible. A huge amount of
| repli
On Wednesday 14 August 2002 11:03 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I think this is a step in the right direction, and it is surely not
> worse than the thingie I did.
Sure, but I think that the implementation is horrible. A huge amount of
replicated code. I thought of a much more elegant approac
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Attached is a patch that turns guiapi and Dialogs on their head, as I
| proposed the other day.
|
| The guiapi functions no longer require a LyXView argument. Instead, they
| invoke the Dialogs methods and so guiapi.C is now common to all frontends.
Attached is a patch that turns guiapi and Dialogs on their head, as I
proposed the other day.
The guiapi functions no longer require a LyXView argument. Instead, they
invoke the Dialogs methods and so guiapi.C is now common to all frontends.
The "work" is done in xforms/Dialogs.C xforms/Dialog
