Re: [PATCH: Update->PS] Re: Update DVI bug still there

2002-04-30 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 12:14:45PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote: > >> However, we shouldn't and don't have to rely on this setting: just enforce >> that gv is always properly updating by adding the "-watch" flag to the gv >> Viewer command in lib/configure.m4. P

Re: [PATCH: Update->PS] Re: Update DVI bug still there

2002-04-30 Thread John Levon
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 12:14:45PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote: > However, we shouldn't and don't have to rely on this setting: just enforce > that gv is always properly updating by adding the "-watch" flag to the gv > Viewer command in lib/configure.m4. PATCH ATTACHED. If this is for 1.3.0 like Lars

Re: [PATCH: Update->PS] Re: Update DVI bug still there

2002-04-30 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | So, is the following the correct conclusion? > | View->Update->Blabla, should take care that the corresponding | blabla-file in LyX-tmp directory is regenerated, if necessary. > | It's then left up to the blabla-viewer, whether that will | recognize the t

[PATCH: Update->PS] Re: Update DVI bug still there

2002-04-30 Thread R. Lahaye
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes writes: > "R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If there's no signal sent, then what is supposed to be the actual > update-trick? Maybe that can help find the culprit. > > xdvi and gv watch the file to see if it changes. then reloads. > note that xdvi somethings needs