On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 03:01:21PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> > If no shout, I'll commit a bit later.
>
> Please do.
So done.
- Martin
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> OK, here's my latest including a local LFUN_INSET_INSERT.
Thank you.
> If no shout, I'll commit a bit later.
Please do.
--
Angus
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 02:04:06PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
>
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:48:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> I am all in favour of the general thrust (to get things working)
> >> but would want LFUN_INSET_INSERT to be moved across too.
>
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 02:04:06PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Andre', off for a few days now.
> Have a good break.
Conference.
Talk.
*sigh*
Andre'
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:48:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> I am all in favour of the general thrust (to get things working)
>> but would want LFUN_INSET_INSERT to be moved across too.
>> Pleaeee!
>
> So why don't you just do it.
> You are a big boy after
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:48:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I am all in favour of the general thrust (to get things working) but
> would want LFUN_INSET_INSERT to be moved across too.
> Pleaeee!
So why don't you just do it.
You are a big boy after all.
Andre', off for a few day
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:26:53PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> ..
>>
>> >> Attached a patch instrumented with asserts.
>> >>
>> >> Let's check this in. We'll hear about it soon enough if this
>> >> code is
>> >> in use somewhere... I gave it a quick test, but didn
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:26:53PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ..
>
> >> Attached a patch instrumented with asserts.
> >>
> >> Let's check this in. We'll hear about it soon enough if this code is
> >> in use somewhere... I gave it a quick test, but didn't manage to
> >> trigger it.
> >>
> >
...
>> Attached a patch instrumented with asserts.
>>
>> Let's check this in. We'll hear about it soon enough if this code is
>> in use somewhere... I gave it a quick test, but didn't manage to
>> trigger it.
>>
>> (Is there a way to check more systematically whether a piece of code
>> _ever_ get
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 02:58:01PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:13:14PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thusly:
>
> > It doesn't get called, that's what's wrong with it.
> >
> > What implications does deleting the above code from
> > BufferView::Pimpl::dispatch have?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:13:14PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thusly:
> It doesn't get called, that's what's wrong with it.
>
> What implications does deleting the above code from
> BufferView::Pimpl::dispatch have? I haven't tried it.
Attached a patch instrumented with asserts.
Let's ch
11 matches
Mail list logo
