John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:50:36PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> And if we have some 4-5 of the regular list participants as
>> moderators this would work just fine.
>
| If it's "press a key moderation" I'd be happy to help out...
I am not even s
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:50:36PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> And if we have some 4-5 of the regular list participants as
> moderators this would work just fine.
If it's "press a key moderation" I'd be happy to help out...
john
--
"Please let's not resume the argument with the usual
Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Presently the only "almost" sure thing is that the sender of a
| spam/virus will not reply to the proper address of a confirmation
| request.
Moderation would also work.
All new subscribers are automatically moderated until the moderator
turns moderatio
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 12:13:53AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:08:40AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | So then removing attachments is just snakeoil: viruses are
> > | application/octet-stream.
> >
> > Doeas
On Wednesday 01 May 2002 05:21, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> So then removing attachments is just snakeoil: viruses are
> application/octet-stream.
Mail viruses are frequently of almost any MIME type ... it's usually the
file extension that determines what certain brain-damaged MUAs pay
attention to.
Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:08:40AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | So then removing attachments is just snakeoil: viruses are
>> | application/octet-stream.
>>
>> Doeas all virii use octet-stream? I t
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:08:40AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | So then removing attachments is just snakeoil: viruses are
> | application/octet-stream.
>
> Doeas all virii use octet-stream? I think not.
>
> | As for size restriction: it is a
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:08:40AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | So then removing attachments is just snakeoil: viruses are
> | application/octet-stream.
>
> Doeas all virii use octet-stream? I think not.
>
> | As for size restriction: it is a
Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| So then removing attachments is just snakeoil: viruses are
| application/octet-stream.
Doeas all virii use octet-stream? I think not.
| As for size restriction: it is again snakeoil with the proposed limits:
| Klez is 120K.
Did you do this only for the
So then removing attachments is just snakeoil: viruses are
application/octet-stream.
As for size restriction: it is again snakeoil with the proposed limits:
Klez is 120K.
On the other hand, I see people happily sending 300+K attachments (eps
files, say, with no compression) regularly on the user
10 matches
Mail list logo
