On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> wrote:
>> Le 21/05/2015 07:09, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>>>
>>> We could also do this for the advanced find and the spell check
>>> dialogs. Toggling seems more intuitive to me for
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 21/05/2015 07:09, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>>
>> We could also do this for the advanced find and the spell check
>> dialogs. Toggling seems more intuitive to me for those also. Let me
>> know if others would want this change. If w
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 21/05/2015 11:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>>
>> Ah, I see what you mean. I will revert, and mark #8388 as 'wontfix'
>> unless there are objections. It does not seem useful to have two such
>> close bindings.
>
>
> Yes, I think thi
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 21/05/2015 11:20, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>>
>> Is it possible to close the outline? It would be nice if ESC did this.
>> Currently ESC puts the cursor back in the workarea which is a nice
>> function, but TAB can already be used
Le 21/05/2015 11:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Ah, I see what you mean. I will revert, and mark #8388 as 'wontfix'
unless there are objections. It does not seem useful to have two such
close bindings.
Yes, I think this is the best we can do right now.
JMarc
Le 21/05/2015 11:20, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Is it possible to close the outline? It would be nice if ESC did this.
Currently ESC puts the cursor back in the workarea which is a nice
function, but TAB can already be used for this.
Yes, I think that Esc should do it. OTOH, wouldn't it be usefu
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> wrote:
>> Le 21/05/2015 07:08, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>>>
>>> commit bede4d320bfff26fcbea396b516b92eb9595940c
>>> Author: Scott Kostyshak
>>> Date: Thu May 21 00:59:08 2015 -040
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 21/05/2015 07:08, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>>
>> commit bede4d320bfff26fcbea396b516b92eb9595940c
>> Author: Scott Kostyshak
>> Date: Thu May 21 00:59:08 2015 -0400
>>
>> toc bind: 'dialog-show' -> 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)
>>
Le 21/05/2015 07:08, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
commit bede4d320bfff26fcbea396b516b92eb9595940c
Author: Scott Kostyshak
Date: Thu May 21 00:59:08 2015 -0400
toc bind: 'dialog-show' -> 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)
Toggling is more intuitive for this dialog.
There is one use that is not
Le 21/05/2015 07:09, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
We could also do this for the advanced find and the spell check
dialogs. Toggling seems more intuitive to me for those also. Let me
know if others would want this change. If we did that though, we might
want to change the menus to use toggling also (
Am Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2015 um 01:09:57, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > commit bede4d320bfff26fcbea396b516b92eb9595940c
> > Author: Scott Kostyshak
> > Date: Thu May 21 00:59:08 2015 -0400
> >
> > toc bind: 'dialog-show' -> 'dialog-to
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> commit bede4d320bfff26fcbea396b516b92eb9595940c
> Author: Scott Kostyshak
> Date: Thu May 21 00:59:08 2015 -0400
>
> toc bind: 'dialog-show' -> 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)
>
> Toggling is more intuitive for this dialog.
We could als
12 matches
Mail list logo
