On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 04:55:26PM GMT, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 24.07.2024 um 10:20 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > I just pushed. There was one file that had a non-trivial diff. Does
> > the following look expected, or at least harmless?
>
> absolutely expected.
Thanks, p
Am Mittwoch, dem 24.07.2024 um 10:20 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> I just pushed. There was one file that had a non-trivial diff. Does
> the following look expected, or at least harmless?
absolutely expected.
--
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
l
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 07:21:13AM GMT, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, dem 23.07.2024 um 15:16 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Can we update the layouts now?
>
> Go ahead. Nobody seems to have time to look at the problem.
I just pushed. There was one file that had a non-trivial diff.
Am Dienstag, dem 23.07.2024 um 15:16 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Can we update the layouts now?
Go ahead. Nobody seems to have time to look at the problem.
--
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 05:15:07PM GMT, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Montag, dem 03.06.2024 um 16:00 +0100 schrieb José Matos:
> > So I think that for the moment a pragmatic solution is to always
> > update
> > the layouts when updating the layout format. By reviewing the changes
> > we can ensur
Am Montag, dem 03.06.2024 um 16:00 +0100 schrieb José Matos:
> So I think that for the moment a pragmatic solution is to always
> update
> the layouts when updating the layout format. By reviewing the changes
> we can ensure that the update code does what it should.
I might have misunderstood the
On Mon, 2024-06-03 at 16:15 +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Hm, I intentionally held that back unless we fix the problem
> discussed at https://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel&m=171733833610242&w=2
IMHO I think that for the moment the right approach is really to update
the layouts. :-)
The optimization
On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 04:15:21PM GMT, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Montag, dem 03.06.2024 um 02:53 + schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > commit 7c041af6425001d7779f5e44d72918d8591ea37d
> > Author: Scott Kostyshak
> > Date: Sun Jun 2 22:52:37 2024 -0400
> >
> > Update layouts
>
> Hm, I int
Am Montag, dem 03.06.2024 um 02:53 + schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> commit 7c041af6425001d7779f5e44d72918d8591ea37d
> Author: Scott Kostyshak
> Date: Sun Jun 2 22:52:37 2024 -0400
>
> Update layouts
Hm, I intentionally held that back unless we fix the problem discussed
at https://marc.info
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 08:30:22AM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Monday, 25 October 2021 18.48.18 WEST José Abílio Matos wrote:
> > FWIW maybe it could help if this was part of the standard process of layout
> > format updates.
> >
> > If problems occur that is the reason why we have git fo
On Monday, 25 October 2021 18.48.18 WEST José Abílio Matos wrote:
> FWIW maybe it could help if this was part of the standard process of layout
> format updates.
>
> If problems occur that is the reason why we have git for.
>
> Not only that but the person that commits the change is the one that
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 06:48:18PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Monday, 25 October 2021 17.14.36 WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Update layouts (run layout2layout.py)
> >
> > There is nothing in the diff besides the format number changing from
> > 93 to 95. From what I understa
On Monday, 25 October 2021 17.14.36 WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Update layouts (run layout2layout.py)
>
> There is nothing in the diff besides the format number changing from
> 93 to 95. From what I understand, this is as expected since 93 -> 94
> and 94 -> 95 just add new layout
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 04:51:55PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 09:37:20PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 09:24:37PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > >
> > > I think the attached patch
> > > is what is missing.
> >
> > Sorry, there was a
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 09:37:20PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 09:24:37PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> > I think the attached patch
> > is what is missing.
>
> Sorry, there was a colon missing in the "if" line. Corrected patch attached.
Thanks. Reverted at
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 09:24:37PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> I think the attached patch
> is what is missing.
Sorry, there was a colon missing in the "if" line. Corrected patch attached.
--
Enrico
diff --git a/lib/scripts/layout2layout.py b/lib/scripts/layout2layout.py
index 74119bb67
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 12:02:41PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 05:22:45PM +0200, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > commit 5d7efd2fa934b138933ffed5a1e19c9d52e8d933
> > Author: Scott Kostyshak
> > Date: Sun Sep 27 11:44:59 2020 -0400
> >
> > Update layouts
> >
> >
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 05:22:45PM +0200, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> commit 5d7efd2fa934b138933ffed5a1e19c9d52e8d933
> Author: Scott Kostyshak
> Date: Sun Sep 27 11:44:59 2020 -0400
>
> Update layouts
>
> Fixes a slight delay when cutting (#11988).
Can someone take a look at the fol
18 matches
Mail list logo
