Kornel Benko wrote:
> After this change, 100% of tex2lyx tests passed.
> Someone has to verify though, that no other changes were needed
> for this new format.
There is a simple algorithm for this: Is the lyx2lyx conversion empty? => no
change needed in tex2lyx. Otherwise, look at the lyx2lyx co
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Done.
They pass here now. Thanks.
Scott
Am Dienstag, 5. Mai 2015 um 12:25:15, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
> 2015-05-05 12:22 GMT+02:00 Kornel Benko:
>
> >
> > Sure it helps.
> > The only differences are in *.lyx.lyx
> > -\lyxformat 485
> > +\lyxformat 488
> >
> > After this change, 100% of tex2lyx tests passed.
> > Someo
2015-05-05 12:22 GMT+02:00 Kornel Benko:
>
> Sure it helps.
> The only differences are in *.lyx.lyx
> -\lyxformat 485
> +\lyxformat 488
>
> After this change, 100% of tex2lyx tests passed.
> Someone has to verify though, that no other changes were needed
> for this new format.
>
P
Am Dienstag, 5. Mai 2015 um 11:19:08, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
> 2015-05-05 10:43 GMT+02:00 Scott Kostyshak:
>
> > A git bisect suggests this commit broke the tex2lyx tests.
> >
> > I suppose something like 4069e3da is needed?
> >
>
> Maybe. Can you try if updating the test cases helps?
Sure
2015-05-05 10:43 GMT+02:00 Scott Kostyshak:
> A git bisect suggests this commit broke the tex2lyx tests.
>
> I suppose something like 4069e3da is needed?
>
Maybe. Can you try if updating the test cases helps?
Jürgen
>
> Scott
>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> commit 225a37be39a1b8588850c46db6468adf05ba7cdc
> Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
> Date: Mon Apr 20 12:15:20 2015 +0200
>
> Support item argument in linguistic examples
>
> File format change.
A git bisect suggests this commi
