Le 02/10/2020 à 19:11, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
On 10/2/20 12:29 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
/// Does an optional argument follow after the current token?
- bool hasOpt(std::string const l = "[");
+ bool hasOpt(std::string const & l = "[");
I am a bit surprised t
On 10/2/20 12:29 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> /// Does an optional argument follow after the current token?
> - bool hasOpt(std::string const l = "[");
> + bool hasOpt(std::string const & l = "[");
I am a bit surprised that this is allowed---it looks like a reference to
a tempor
