Am Dienstag, 5. Juli 2016 um 21:53:49, schrieb Georg Baum
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Did it at a51847f.
> >
> > By the way, I get these linkage error independently if I select both (z +
> > iconv) as local or only one of them. Tested each time on empty build build
> > tree.
>
> Thank you very
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Did it at a51847f.
>
> By the way, I get these linkage error independently if I select both (z +
> iconv) as local or only one of them. Tested each time on empty build build
> tree.
Thank you very much. I am sorry for the trouble and might have a look with a
more recent gc
Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2016 um 19:00:15, schrieb Georg Baum
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > I cannot compile anymore with this change with cmake.
> > Previously selecting LYX_3RDPARTY_BUILD, I was able to compile and bind
> > with our hunspell sources.
> > Now the compilation is OK too, but if it comes
Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2016 um 20:02:35, schrieb Georg Baum
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > No, sorry. Looks like the same quadrillion error messages.
>
> I do not understand how these errors could be related to my commit. Do they
> go away if you call cmake without LYX_3RDPARTY_BUILD?
Definitely ye
Kornel Benko wrote:
> No, sorry. Looks like the same quadrillion error messages.
I do not understand how these errors could be related to my commit. Do they
go away if you call cmake without LYX_3RDPARTY_BUILD?
> Trying now with clean build tree:
> ...
> Same result. As an example, this is the
Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2016 um 19:00:15, schrieb Georg Baum
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > I cannot compile anymore with this change with cmake.
> > Previously selecting LYX_3RDPARTY_BUILD, I was able to compile and bind
> > with our hunspell sources.
> > Now the compilation is OK too, but if it comes
Kornel Benko wrote:
> I cannot compile anymore with this change with cmake.
> Previously selecting LYX_3RDPARTY_BUILD, I was able to compile and bind
> with our hunspell sources.
> Now the compilation is OK too, but if it comes to bind I have many
> unsatisfied references.
>
> Will try to find o