On 7/23/25 9:53 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Samstag, dem 19.10.2024 um 08:04 + schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
commit 4d51a05ce401bd1ad7c2bae5b6aeb7a2b494f35a
Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
Date: Sat Oct 19 09:57:24 2024 +0200
Address Qt 6.7 deprecation warning
See https
Am Samstag, dem 19.10.2024 um 08:04 + schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
> commit 4d51a05ce401bd1ad7c2bae5b6aeb7a2b494f35a
> Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
> Date: Sat Oct 19 09:57:24 2024 +0200
>
> Address Qt 6.7 deprecation warning
>
> See https://doc.qt.io/qt-6.7/qdatetime-obsolete
Am Montag, dem 21.10.2024 um 17:15 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> So I can change the guard to check for Qt 6.5? It is better to have
> precise versions so that we know what #ifdefs can go when José forces
> us to require Qt 6.6 ;)
Yes, please go ahead.
--
Jürgen
--
lyx-devel mailing li
Le 20/10/2024 à 08:04, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Samstag, dem 19.10.2024 um 19:24 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
It seems to me that this is usable from Qt 6.5:
https://www.qt.io/blog/unifying-qttimespec-within-qtimezone
Or is it something else?
Yes, looks like it. The deprecation
Am Samstag, dem 19.10.2024 um 19:24 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> It seems to me that this is usable from Qt 6.5:
> https://www.qt.io/blog/unifying-qttimespec-within-qtimezone
>
> Or is it something else?
Yes, looks like it. The deprecation is only from 6.7 though.
--
Jürgen
--
lyx-dev
Le 19/10/2024 à 10:04, Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
commit 4d51a05ce401bd1ad7c2bae5b6aeb7a2b494f35a
Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
Date: Sat Oct 19 09:57:24 2024 +0200
Address Qt 6.7 deprecation warning
See https://doc.qt.io/qt-6.7/qdatetime-obsolete.html#setTimeSpec
It seem
On 5/20/24 08:02, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag, dem 20.05.2024 um 10:37 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
What about putting it in 2.4.1?
Yes, why not. Currently it is just another annoying warning, though.
OK for 2.4.1.
Riki
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http
Am Montag, dem 20.05.2024 um 14:09 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> > Yes, why not. Currently it is just another annoying warning,
> > though.
>
> Yes, but eventually it will bite. And we know that 2.4 will stay for
> 2+ years.
Good point. Riki?
--
Jürgen
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-dev
Le 20/05/2024 à 14:02, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Montag, dem 20.05.2024 um 10:37 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
What about putting it in 2.4.1?
Yes, why not. Currently it is just another annoying warning, though.
Yes, but eventually it will bite. And we know that 2.4 will stay fo
Am Montag, dem 20.05.2024 um 10:37 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> What about putting it in 2.4.1?
Yes, why not. Currently it is just another annoying warning, though.
--
Jürgen
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
What about putting it in 2.4.1?
JMarc
Le 20 mai 2024 09:49:57 GMT+02:00, Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit
:
>commit 44633c7f729e79ea023f2a5ccbbdd0002411619f
>Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
>Date: Mon May 20 09:49:10 2024 +0200
>
>Address Qt 6.7 deprecation warning
>---
> src/frontends/qt/Gui
11 matches
Mail list logo