Am Sonntag, den 14.07.2019, 16:59 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> - texlive 2016 seem to pass (luatex + babel 3.9r - debian stretch).
> - texlive 2012 seem to pass (xetex + babel, luatex can't be run for
> some class missing).
Thanks!
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed me
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 05:14:57PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 12.07.2019, 16:54 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > What 2.3 construct has to be used in my dodcument to fail in 2.4 when
> > I have older babel?
>
> Non-TeX fonts, Language Package "Always Babel". Compile with eith
Le 13/07/2019 à 08:29, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Or could we do a \providecommand{\babelfont} that defines a fake
command
that actually uses Xe/LuTeX constructs?
I would avoid putting any additional code into the LaTeX output, if at
all possible.
You are right. Thanks for the update.
JMar
Am Freitag, den 12.07.2019, 21:05 + schrieb Guenter Milde:
> Yes, this helps.
Good. Committed.
> The babel version does not show up in Help>LaTeX configuration,
This is not implemented (but I added something now that mentions
babelfont status).
> but
> supported-languages_babel_non-tex is
Am Freitag, den 12.07.2019, 19:50 + schrieb Guenter Milde:
> But in my understanding, loading fontspec is not the problem, only
> selecting
> fonts "the fontspec way". So, users could just check "use non-TeX
> fonts",
> leave the fonts at [Default] and configure using "babelfonts" in the
> user
Am Freitag, den 12.07.2019, 17:45 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Instead of testing for babel version, what about checking whether
> babel
> provides \babelfont, which is what we need?
But we know exactly the version in which babelfont was officially
introduced and declared as being suppor
On 2019-07-12, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> Am Freitag, den 12.07.2019, 08:59 + schrieb Guenter Milde:
>> > If you insist, though, I can add some test and do babelfonts only
>> > for
>> > these recent versions.
>> This would be the right
On 2019-07-12, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> Am Freitag, den 12.07.2019, 16:54 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>> What 2.3 construct has to be used in my dodcument to fail in 2.4 when
>> I have older babel?
> Non-TeX fonts,
> Language Package "Alw
On 2019-07-12, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> Am Freitag, den 12.07.2019, 08:59 + schrieb Guenter Milde:
>> I understand that "babelfonts" is required to set language-specific
>> fonts
>> (cf. #11522) with Babel. Until this is implemented in
Le 12/07/2019 à 15:38, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Freitag, den 12.07.2019, 08:59 + schrieb Guenter Milde:
If you insist, though, I can add some test and do babelfonts only
for
these recent versions.
This would be the right thing as long as Debian/stable ships babel
3.9r.
Can you ple
Am Freitag, den 12.07.2019, 16:54 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> What 2.3 construct has to be used in my dodcument to fail in 2.4 when
> I have older babel?
Non-TeX fonts, Language Package "Always Babel". Compile with either
Lua- or XeTeX.
> And do I need to do something specific wrt fonts/babel in
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 07:17:24PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 11.07.2019, 17:54 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> > My concern is to know whether documents that used to work wwith 2.3 on
> > older TeX distributions will continue to work with 2.4.
>
> Sure. As said, w
Am Freitag, den 12.07.2019, 08:59 + schrieb Guenter Milde:
> > If you insist, though, I can add some test and do babelfonts only
> > for
> > these recent versions.
>
> This would be the right thing as long as Debian/stable ships babel
> 3.9r.
Can you please test the attached patch to this end
Am Freitag, den 12.07.2019, 08:59 + schrieb Guenter Milde:
> I understand that "babelfonts" is required to set language-specific
> fonts
> (cf. #11522) with Babel. Until this is implemented in the GUI, what
> is
> the advantage of using "babelfonts" over fontspec?
See babel manual:
WARNING Do
On 2019-07-11, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 11.07.2019, 13:52 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc
> Lasgouttes:
>> I do not have time to test right now, but what happens with babel
>> versions < 3.15 (2017)? I do not have that on my Ubuntu 16.04
>> installation.
The TeXlive included in Debi
Am Donnerstag, den 11.07.2019, 19:17 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Donnerstag, den 11.07.2019, 17:54 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc
> Lasgouttes:
> > My concern is to know whether documents that used to work wwith 2.3
> > on
> > older TeX distributions will continue to work with 2.4.
>
> Sure.
Am Donnerstag, den 11.07.2019, 17:54 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
> My concern is to know whether documents that used to work wwith 2.3
> on
> older TeX distributions will continue to work with 2.4.
Sure. As said, we can try to provide this, given that we can add a test
for package version
Le 11/07/2019 à 15:04, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Donnerstag, den 11.07.2019, 13:52 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
I do not have time to test right now, but what happens with babel
versions < 3.15 (2017)? I do not have that on my Ubuntu 16.04
installation.
I think we can consider the
Am Donnerstag, den 11.07.2019, 13:52 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
> I do not have time to test right now, but what happens with babel
> versions < 3.15 (2017)? I do not have that on my Ubuntu 16.04
> installation.
I think we can consider them unsupported with non-TeX fonts (by the
time 2.4
Le 11/07/2019 à 13:15, Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
commit cb5bd87e9c16f3dc1a774ece4f78d7c63cc4c645
Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
Date: Thu Jul 11 13:21:32 2019 +0200
Add support for \babelfont
This is a higher-level (non-TeX) font interface of babel that draws on,
but
20 matches
Mail list logo
