Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>> Here is what I had in mind. Works quite well.
> >> Who would have guessed what the innocent commit of such esoteric lfun
> >> would trigger :)
> >
> > It is still small activity :) Does it work for you?
>
> Will try tomorrow.
Your patch work
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> Here is what I had in mind. Works quite well.
>> Who would have guessed what the innocent commit of such esoteric lfun
>> would trigger :)
>
> It is still small activity :) Does it work for you?
Will try tomorrow.
>> But since I caught your attention, would you mi
Le 07/02/2018 à 16:44, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
It is :)
Given that one needs this lfun twice per year, I don't think that's a big
deal...
Pavel
Here is what I had in mind. Works quite well.
Who would have guessed what the innocent commit of such esoteric lfun would
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> It is :)
>> Given that one needs this lfun twice per year, I don't think that's a big
>> deal...
>> Pavel
>
> Here is what I had in mind. Works quite well.
Who would have guessed what the innocent commit of such esoteric lfun would
trigger :)
But since I caught yo
Le 07/02/2018 à 11:29, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Am I right that this does 40+ full-document search and replace? Performance
on LyX User Guide is terrible, but seeing the document change by letter
groups is quite amusing. Then LyX needs 2.4G of memory due to undo and
perf
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Am I right that this does 40+ full-document search and replace? Performance
> on LyX User Guide is terrible, but seeing the document change by letter
> groups is quite amusing. Then LyX needs 2.4G of memory due to undo and
> performance of undo is abysmal.
It is :)
