Florian Verhein wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would really apreciate some help with this, as LyX (v1.5.1-1 for Windows)
> crashes every time I try to run it (either by double-clicking on a lyx file
> or opening lyx directly).
> Here is what happens:
>
>
>
> creating doc/LaTeXConfig.lyx
> LyX: Done
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:45:30PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> >> > Writing the emergency file is only part of what I want. I also want to
> >> > present the user with a dialog telling him about the error and giving
> >> > him the option to continue at his own risk.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> > Writing the emergency file is only part of what I want. I also want to
>> > present the user with a dialog telling him about the error and giving
>> > him the option to continue at his own risk.
>> >
>> > There is absolutely no reason to abort if i.e. s&r or loading of a
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> Oh, you don't agree with me.
>
> See Alfredo? I can now parse Andre' pretty well ;-)
Haha you're right. Maybe you can give a talk about it some time ;-)
A/
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 08:34:03PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> >> I agree with Andre'. We should abort ASAP with an emergency file, with
> >> e.g. memory corruption. So IMO asserts are fine in the final release.
> >
> > Oh, you don't agree with me.
>
> I don't?
>
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> I agree with Andre'. We should abort ASAP with an emergency file, with
>> e.g. memory corruption. So IMO asserts are fine in the final release.
>
> Oh, you don't agree with me.
I don't?
> Writing the emergency file is only part of what I want. I also want to
> present t
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:50:07AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
But it's the least helpful and the most annoying approach.
We should change that.
Sure but for trunk.
I agree with Andre'. We should abort ASAP with an emergency file, with e.g
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:50:07AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
>
> >> But it's the least helpful and the most annoying approach.
> >> We should change that.
> >
> > Sure but for trunk.
>
> I agree with Andre'. We should abort ASAP with an emergency file, with
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>
>>
But it's the least helpful and the most annoying approach.
We should change that.
>>> Sure but for trunk.
>>
>> I agree with Andre'. We should abort ASAP with an emergency file, with
>> e.g. memory
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
But it's the least helpful and the most annoying approach.
We should change that.
Sure but for trunk.
I agree with Andre'. We should abort ASAP with an emergency file, with e.g.
memory corruption. So IMO asserts are fine in the final relea
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> But it's the least helpful and the most annoying approach.
>> We should change that.
>
> Sure but for trunk.
I agree with Andre'. We should abort ASAP with an emergency file, with e.g.
memory corruption. So IMO asserts are fine in the final release.
A/
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 08:38:20AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 07:39:26PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
The developers' list is a better place for this kind of thing.
If you could get a backtrace, we could at least start to figure out
where this is c
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 08:38:20AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 07:39:26PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> >
> > The developers' list is a better place for this kind of thing.
> >
> > If you could get a backtrace, we could at least start to figure out
> > where this is com
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 07:39:26PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
The developers' list is a better place for this kind of thing.
If you could get a backtrace, we could at least start to figure out
where this is coming from.
rh
Hmmm... shouldn"t assertions be off in the en
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 07:39:26PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> The developers' list is a better place for this kind of thing.
>
> If you could get a backtrace, we could at least start to figure out
> where this is coming from.
>
> rh
Hmmm... shouldn"t assertions be off in the end user versi
The developers' list is a better place for this kind of thing.
If you could get a backtrace, we could at least start to figure out
where this is coming from.
rh
Original Message
Subject:help: LyX crashes on startup... every time
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:44:46 +10
dear sir,
what must I do that upgrade my LyX 1.0.3 to LyX 1.1.5Pre1?
FreeBSD 3.3 Stable
I've unpacked and begun "make install",it was writenn "don't how make"
I 've begun "./configure",I've got next
that libXpm and libxforms(libforms) is not on this operating system.
I check and find taht all
> "Rod" == Rod Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rod> Hello, Thanks for the cc, I don't consider myself a developer, so
Rod> I don't read the developer list. I couldn't keep up with the
Rod> volume either I suspect. I have put together a layout file for
Rod> the Elsevier class, so I'll forwar
Hello,
Thanks for the cc, I don't consider myself a developer, so I don't read
the developer list. I couldn't keep up with the volume either I suspect. I
have put together a layout file for the Elsevier class, so I'll forward it
on.
BTW, if anyone is interested, I haven't had much of a chance to
> João Alfredo Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I am a master degree student, work with chaos in time series. I
>> would like work with lyx. I need write a paper for ELSEVIER
>> (Physica D).
>>
>> Can you help me? How can I transform a .cls file in .layout file?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
Hi Guys,
Can anyone help out João on this one? Please cc any responses to João
himself.
This might be a good oportunity to get another formal layout file written!
Ben
>From: João Alfredo Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Help
>Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 16:19:13 -0300
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
