On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 02:53:25PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > (Do you want to send me your patch for 1.4 again ?)
>
> Yes, shure.
applied
thanks
john
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 09:08:35AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > Just that the user does not expect that the clipboard is modified.
> > There should not be any clipboard modification without an explicit
> > cut/copy.
>
> Well then how about this? (As I said, the current implementation is
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 02:28:13PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> OK. Then I'm out (no more ideas). But I vote for removing the current
> conversion. If we don't do it right, we should not do it at all.
We wouldn't end up doing anything, we do barely anything fully
correctly.
Why can't we
John Levon wrote:
> We wouldn't end up doing anything, we do barely anything fully
> correctly.
>
> Why can't we just use your patch, and file a bug on the broken clipboard
> behaviour ? It's a reasonable tradeoff of bugs IMHO.
Note that even if this might sound so, I am not frustrated at all. It'
John Levon wrote:
> Rejected. We don't fix our bugs by trying to fix our users. Or rather,
> we shouldn't.
OK. Then I'm out (no more ideas). But I vote for removing the current
conversion. If we don't do it right, we should not do it at all.
Jürgen.
