Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I did lyxclient. For tex2lyx, I'd like to merge my bigger changes to
> branch first. I guess I have to wait a bit for that?
Yes, a few days (until it's clear what 1.6.2 actually is).
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Juergen, want that for 1.6.3? It is minor anyway.
>
> Yes. I take it is is slightly more work for the other man pages?
I did lyxclient. For tex2lyx, I'd like to merge my bigger changes to
branch first. I guess I have to wait a bit for t
Kornel Benko writes:
> Am 2009-03-09 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>> Kornel Benko writes:
>> >> I modified lyx.1in, and at least cmake builds this one correct.
>> >
>> > As it turns out, I am not skilled enough to modify configure.ac properly
>> > to
>> > handle string @PROGRAM_SUFFIX@ :(
>>
Am 2009-03-09 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Kornel Benko writes:
> >> I modified lyx.1in, and at least cmake builds this one correct.
> >
> > As it turns out, I am not skilled enough to modify configure.ac properly to
> > handle string @PROGRAM_SUFFIX@ :(
>
> The only problem was that you have
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Juergen, want that for 1.6.3? It is minor anyway.
>
> Yes. I take it is is slightly more work for the other man pages?
Slightly. They are not autogenerated right now. I should do it, I know :)
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen, want that for 1.6.3? It is minor anyway.
Yes. I take it is is slightly more work for the other man pages?
Jürgen
Kornel Benko writes:
>> I modified lyx.1in, and at least cmake builds this one correct.
>
> As it turns out, I am not skilled enough to modify configure.ac properly to
> handle string @PROGRAM_SUFFIX@ :(
The only problem was that you have used cmake for too long and put
CAPITALS everywhere :) Au
Am Sonntag 08 März 2009 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Am Sonntag 08 März 2009 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
...
> >
> > lyx.1 is qlready generated from lyx.1in. It would be trivial to set
> > up the same for tex2lyx.1.
> >
> > JMarc
>
> I modified lyx.1in, and at least cmake builds this one correct.
As
Am Sonntag 08 März 2009 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> >> Ah, yes. I think this is all hardcoded in the troff files (i.e.,
> >> this is
> >> static text).
> >
> > Yes, I know. But we could use something similar to the conversion of
> > "lib/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx_version.py.in" to ".../lyx2lyx_version.py
Ah, yes. I think this is all hardcoded in the troff files (i.e.,
this is
static text).
Yes, I know. But we could use something similar to the conversion of
"lib/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx_version.py.in" to ".../lyx2lyx_version.py".
lyx.1 is qlready generated from lyx.1in. It would be trivial to set
u
Am Sonntag 08 März 2009 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Say, i install with
> > configure --with-version-suffix=2.3.4 ...
> > make
> > sudo make install
> >
> > Then i get
> > .../man/man1/tex2lyx2.3.4.1
> > #egrep tex2lyx .../man/man1/tex2lyx2.
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Say, i install with
> configure --with-version-suffix=2.3.4 ...
> make
> sudo make install
>
> Then i get
> .../man/man1/tex2lyx2.3.4.1
> #egrep tex2lyx .../man/man1/tex2lyx2.3.4.1 ==>
> many lines refering to "tex2lyx", but nothing refe
Am Sonntag 08 März 2009 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Related to this may also be, that our manuals are refering the
> > unversioned executables, even if we were installing versioned lyx.
>
> Can you elaborate a bit?
Say, i install with
configure --with-version-suff
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Related to this may also be, that our manuals are refering the unversioned
> executables, even if we were installing versioned lyx.
Can you elaborate a bit?
Jürgen
Am Sonntag 08 März 2009 schrieb sp...@lyx.org:
> Author: spitz
...
> ===
>=== --- lyx-devel/trunk/src/tex2lyx/Makefile.am (original)
> +++ lyx-devel/trunk/src/tex2lyx/Makefile.am Sun Mar 8 11:49:06 2009
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> in
15 matches
Mail list logo
