Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It is useful for example when one wants to have two consecutive
>> theorems.
>
> Ah, good to know. I always inserted a zero-height vspace. Maybe this
> should be made more intuitive then?
Yes, but this is the best we were able to come with :)
JMa
>> It is useful for example when one wants to have two consecutive
>> theorems.
>
> Ah, good to know. I always inserted a zero-height vspace. Maybe this
> should be made more intuitive then?
Separate Environment -> Separate Identical Environment ?
pavel
> >>> the poor --separator-- issue... look on the previous screenshot.
> >>
> >> What is this separator layout after all? Where is it supposed to be?
> >
> > to be frank i have never used it and have no idea of its purpose.
>
> It is useful for example when one wants to have two consecutive
> theo
Am 10.03.2008 um 15:09 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
the poor --separator-- issue... look on the previous screenshot.
What is this separator layout after all? Where is it supposed to be?
to be frank i have never used it and have no idea of its purpo
Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> the poor --separator-- issue... look on the previous screenshot.
>>
>> What is this separator layout after all? Where is it supposed to be?
>
> to be frank i have never used it and have no idea of its purpose.
It is useful for example when one wants to
> 3.. sorting in grouped version is not right.
What is wrong?
>>>
>>> the poor --separator-- issue... look on the previous screenshot.
>> What is this separator layout after all? Where is it supposed to be?
>
> Now that categories are implemented I guess it is supposed to go to
> /de
>> the poor --separator-- issue... look on the previous screenshot.
>
> What is this separator layout after all? Where is it supposed to be?
to be frank i have never used it and have no idea of its purpose.
pavel
Am 10.03.2008 um 15:01 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 10.03.2008 um 14:54 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
3.. sorting in grouped version is not right.
What is wrong?
the poor --separator-- issue... look on the previous screenshot.
What is this separator layout after all? Whe
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 10.03.2008 um 14:54 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
3.. sorting in grouped version is not right.
What is wrong?
the poor --separator-- issue... look on the previous screenshot.
What is this separator layout after all? Where is it supposed to be?
Now that categories are
Am 10.03.2008 um 14:54 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
i dont know how does it look on your mac, but there are still
problems
here.
1. the height of every item is way tooo much - look on attachment.
This should not be. Will investigate. On Mac it's fine, on Linux
with clean
look as well. I hope thi
> > Is the left screenshot with my patch, put disabled grouping? Or is it
> > without my latest patch?
>
> its lyx 1.5
i just checked some old 1.6 revision (r23353) and the height is still ok there.
pavel
>> i dont know how does it look on your mac, but there are still problems
>> here.
>> 1. the height of every item is way tooo much - look on attachment.
>
> This should not be. Will investigate. On Mac it's fine, on Linux with clean
> look as well. I hope this is solvable.
i hope too. (platique
> Is the left screenshot with my patch, put disabled grouping? Or is it
> without my latest patch?
its lyx 1.5
pavel
Am 10.03.2008 um 14:42 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Author: sts
Date: Mon Mar 10 14:02:57 2008
New Revision: 23626
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/23626
Log:
* center the line in the layout category headers in the middle
of the lowercase chars
* some messages for the statusbar
* con
Am 10.03.2008 um 14:42 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Author: sts
Date: Mon Mar 10 14:02:57 2008
New Revision: 23626
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/23626
Log:
* center the line in the layout category headers in the middle
of the lowercase chars
* some messages for the statusbar
* con
15 matches
Mail list logo
