On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:03:32AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> >> OK. Put it in.
> >
> > Done.
>
> You need to add bm to chkconfig.ltx and LaTeXConfig.lyx.
Right. I also made sure that bm is loaded after amsmath.
--
Enrico
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>> OK. Put it in.
>
> Done.
You need to add bm to chkconfig.ltx and LaTeXConfig.lyx.
Jürgen
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 08:42:43PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> OK. Put it in.
Done.
--
Enrico
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> When using \boldsymbol and the amsmath package is not loaded, LyX
> uses an home made definition which is flawed. Indeed, if you have
> a bold super or subscript, the wrong size is used (the same size
> as normalsize). The bm package is recommended by amsmath and produce
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 06:36:13PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > BTW, here is a patch for 1.5. Jürgen, Ok to apply it?
>
> I didn't follow the discussion. Could you outline again what the patch
> changes? Does the output of old documents look different?
When
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> BTW, here is a patch for 1.5. Jürgen, Ok to apply it?
I didn't follow the discussion. Could you outline again what the patch
changes? Does the output of old documents look different?
Jürgen
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 02:27:07PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:01:26PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:30:41AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>
> >>> Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:01:26PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:30:41AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The attached patch is better, IMO. There's no reason to require
the \boldsymbol defi
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:01:26PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:30:41AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > The attached patch is better, IMO. There's no reason to require
> > > the \boldsymbol definition
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:30:41AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The attached patch is better, IMO. There's no reason to require
> > the \boldsymbol definition every time a math inset is used.
>
> Looks good IMO.
I think that this needs
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The attached patch is better, IMO. There's no reason to require
> the \boldsymbol definition every time a math inset is used.
Looks good IMO.
JMarc
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 03:43:05AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I think that this is not acceptable and propose the attached patch,
> such that \bm is used for bold math. In this way, the output remains
> the same independently from the fact that the amsmath package is
> loaded or not, sub an
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 01:37:28AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 11:23:51PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Author: uwestoehr
> > Date: Mon Mar 10 00:23:50 2008
> > New Revision: 23608
> >
> > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/23608
> > Log:
> > InsetMathNe
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 11:23:51PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: uwestoehr
> Date: Mon Mar 10 00:23:50 2008
> New Revision: 23608
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/23608
> Log:
> InsetMathNest.cpp: Ctrl-b uses now \boldsymbol (fixes
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
14 matches
Mail list logo
