> >> Yes. I would put them in Edit.
> >
> > ah, you mean we can change func_type too.
>
> Yes :) It is a very good idea to review this classification and use it
> in our documentation too
i changed the lfuns which i understand what they do. the left corner cases
need to be documented before so
Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Yes. I would put them in Edit.
>
> ah, you mean we can change func_type too.
Yes :) It is a very good idea to review this classification and use it
in our documentation too (can doxygen make subsections or something
like that?)
JMarc
> > ah, you mean we can change func_type too. if i understand correctly this
> > info is used only in shortcut dialog, so Bo could you please look on the
> > current LyXAction.cpp and decide for the few cases?
>
> I would trust your judegement. :-)
i tried to polish it. still some corner cases ex
> ah, you mean we can change func_type too. if i understand correctly this
> info is used only in shortcut dialog, so Bo could you please look on the
> current LyXAction.cpp and decide for the few cases?
I would trust your judegement. :-)
You are right that func_type is just used to categorize sh
> >> I think that we should harmonize the two classifications.
> >
> > to be frank i dont how to do it.
> > take eg these 2 functions:
> > { LFUN_FILE_INSERT, "file-insert", Noop, Buffer },
> > { LFUN_FILE_INSERT_PLAINTEXT, "file-insert-plaintext", Noop, Edit },
> >
> > do you agree they should be
Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think that we should harmonize the two classifications.
>
> to be frank i dont how to do it.
> take eg these 2 functions:
> { LFUN_FILE_INSERT, "file-insert", Noop, Buffer },
> { LFUN_FILE_INSERT_PLAINTEXT, "file-insert-plaintext", Noop, Edit },
>
> do
> >> not in a meticulous way, but in most cases one thematic group
> >> shares its func_type.
>
> I think that we should harmonize the two classifications.
to be frank i dont how to do it.
take eg these 2 functions:
{ LFUN_FILE_INSERT, "file-insert", Noop, Buffer },
{ LFUN_FILE_INSERT_PLAINTEXT,
Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> not in a meticulous way, but in most cases one thematic group
>> shares its func_type.
I think that we should harmonize the two classifications.
> and btw, what is the reason for LFUN_ACCENT_* 'Layout' category
> instead of 'Edit'?
Probably an error.
> > >> Author: sanda
> > >> Date: Fri Jan 11 13:46:12 2008
> > >> New Revision: 22493
> > >>
> > >> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22493
> > >> Log:
> > >> Start of lfun reordering
> > >
> > > i did some basic thematical reorder of lfuns, so the documentation
> > > work will be little less
> >> Author: sanda
> >> Date: Fri Jan 11 13:46:12 2008
> >> New Revision: 22493
> >>
> >> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22493
> >> Log:
> >> Start of lfun reordering
> >
> > i did some basic thematical reorder of lfuns, so the documentation
> > work will be little less chaotical too.
>
>
Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Author: sanda
>> Date: Fri Jan 11 13:46:12 2008
>> New Revision: 22493
>>
>> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22493
>> Log:
>> Start of lfun reordering
>
> i did some basic thematical reorder of lfuns, so the documentation
> work will be little les
> Author: sanda
> Date: Fri Jan 11 13:46:12 2008
> New Revision: 22493
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22493
> Log:
> Start of lfun reordering
i did some basic thematical reorder of lfuns, so the documentation work will be
little less chaotical too.
however i'm not sure that all the l
12 matches
Mail list logo
