Bo Peng wrote:
> I change from 4.3 format to 4.22 (which is supposedly the same as
> 4.1). I could not compile the trunk without this change.
Now I'm puzzled.
Jürgen
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 05:33:08PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
save prefui in qt422 format
Since when do we require qt 4.2?
The format is the same as 4.1.
In any case, we should bump the requirements.
Are you pre
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 05:33:08PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> save prefui in qt422 format
>> Since when do we require qt 4.2?
>
> The format is the same as 4.1.
In any case, we should bump the requirements.
Andre'
On Nov 2, 2007 11:55 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > The format is the same as 4.1.
>
> So why the change? I did the designer changes with qt 4.1.
I change from 4.3 format to 4.22 (which is supposedly the same as
4.1). I could not compile the trunk
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
The format is the same as 4.1.
So why the change? I did the designer changes with qt 4.1.
Yep, and that was the reason why the change was so big in your last
commit. I think Designer 4.2 sometimes re-arrange the structure but it
stays 4.1
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> The format is the same as 4.1.
So why the change? I did the designer changes with qt 4.1.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
save prefui in qt422 format
Since when do we require qt 4.2?
The format is the same as 4.1.
Abdel.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> save prefui in qt422 format
Since when do we require qt 4.2?
Jürgen
