Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I am looking into this now. As I said, it is not complicated. But in
InsetMathNest there is already an implementation:
case LFUN_INSET_TOGGLE:
cur.recordUndo();
lock(!lock());
cur.popForw
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 03:11:13AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:46:18AM +0100, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
> > > Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > >
> > >> If the cursor is in the cell with 42, the unfold command
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:46:18AM +0100, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
>> Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>> If the cursor is in the cell with 42, the unfold command will unfold
>>> the \bar macro. Another press will unfold the \foo macro. Then a
Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But then why are math insets so special here? Only InsetBranch,
> InsetCollapsable and InsetMathNest have an implementation.
InsetCollapsable covers all text insets that can collapse.
Math inset is the only other kind of inset that is highly editab
Martin Vermeer schrieb:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:46:18AM +0100, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
If the cursor is in the cell with 42, the unfold command will unfold
the \bar macro. Another press will unf
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I am looking into this now. As I said, it is not complicated. But in
>> InsetMathNest there is already an implementation:
>>
>> case LFUN_INSET_TOGGLE:
>> cur.recordUndo();
>> lock(!lock());
>> cur.popForward();
>>
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:46:18AM +0100, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
> > Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >> If the cursor is in the cell with 42, the unfold command will unfold
> >> the \bar macro. Another press will unfold the \foo macro. T
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
If the cursor is in the cell with 42, the unfold command will unfold
the \bar macro. Another press will unfold the \foo macro. Then a fold
command will fold the \bar, and another will fold the \foo.
The whole sense
Am Freitag, den 23.11.2007, 16:56 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If the cursor is in the cell with 42, the unfold command will unfold
> > the \bar macro. Another press will unfold the \foo macro. Then a fold
> > command will fold the \bar
Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If the cursor is in the cell with 42, the unfold command will unfold
> the \bar macro. Another press will unfold the \foo macro. Then a fold
> command will fold the \bar, and another will fold the \foo.
>
> The whole sense of this is that you can ver
Am 16.11.2007 um 16:44 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Because it is not a toggle behaviour. If you are inside nested macros
you can unfold several time and the same for fold.
Care to give an example? My point is that we should have the same
funct
Am 16.11.2007 um 15:47 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Author: sts
Date: Thu Nov 1 12:08:04 2007
New Revision: 21327
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/21327
Log:
* LFUNs for math macros and menu integration
+# math-macros
+\bind "C-plus" "math-macro-unfo
Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Because it is not a toggle behaviour. If you are inside nested macros
> you can unfold several time and the same for fold.
Care to give an example? My point is that we should have the same
functions and shortcuts for collapsable insets and collapsab
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Author: sts
> Date: Thu Nov 1 12:08:04 2007
> New Revision: 21327
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/21327
> Log:
> * LFUNs for math macros and menu integration
> +# math-macros
> +\bind "C-plus" "math-macro-unfold"
> +\bind "C-minus""math-macro
14 matches
Mail list logo
