Bo Peng wrote:
LFUNs can accept as many parameters as you like and, in principle, in
whatever form you like. You just have to parse it.
So I guess I can use
LFUN_EMBEDDED_FILES embed file
LFUN_EMBEDDED_FILES add file
etc..
I don't see why not, in principle.
rh
--
==
> LFUNs can accept as many parameters as you like and, in principle, in
> whatever form you like. You just have to parse it.
So I guess I can use
LFUN_EMBEDDED_FILES embed file
LFUN_EMBEDDED_FILES add file
etc..
Bo
Bo Peng wrote:
You are right, but the problem is that there are two many opearations:
add file, extract file, embed file, dis-embed file, ...
How many exactly? Which of these could be useful from the lyx-server?
If LFUN can only accept one parameter, then
LFUN_EMBED_FILE file
LFUN
> > You are right, but the problem is that there are two many opearations:
> > add file, extract file, embed file, dis-embed file, ...
>
> How many exactly? Which of these could be useful from the lyx-server?
If LFUN can only accept one parameter, then
LFUN_EMBED_FILE file
LFUN_UN_EMBED_FILE file
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Makes me wonder: isn't embedding something we would like to do with an
>> lfun (which would take care of the dirty work)?
>
> You are right, but the problem is that there are two many opearations:
> add file, extract file, embed file, dis-embed file, ...
H
> Makes me wonder: isn't embedding something we would like to do with an
> lfun (which would take care of the dirty work)?
You are right, but the problem is that there are two many opearations:
add file, extract file, embed file, dis-embed file, ...
> What happens when the document is read-only?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Author: bpeng
> Date: Thu Sep 13 06:45:49 2007
> New Revision: 20253
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/20253
> Log:
> Embedding: mark buffer dirty after changing embedding status
Makes me wonder: isn't embedding something we would like to do with an
lfun (whic
