Re: [Cvslog] r16441 - /lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/QToc.C

2007-01-04 Thread Peter Kümmel
Georg Baum wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 3. Januar 2007 23:11 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: >> Michael Gerz wrote: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Author: kuemmel Date: Sat Dec 30 15:50:45 2006 New Revision: 16441 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16441 Log: add more lyx

Re: [Cvslog] r16441 - /lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/QToc.C

2007-01-04 Thread Peter Kümmel
Michael Gerz wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: >> Author: kuemmel >> Date: Sat Dec 30 15:50:45 2006 >> New Revision: 16441 >> >> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16441 >> Log: >> add more lyxerr output, don't use a reference (maybe stdlib-debug has >> problems with it) >> >> Modified: >>

Re: [Cvslog] r16441 - /lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/QToc.C

2007-01-04 Thread Georg Baum
Am Mittwoch, 3. Januar 2007 23:11 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > Michael Gerz wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > >> Author: kuemmel > >> Date: Sat Dec 30 15:50:45 2006 > >> New Revision: 16441 > >> > >> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16441 > >> Log: > >> add more lyxerr output, don't use

Re: [Cvslog] r16441 - /lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/QToc.C

2007-01-03 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Michael Gerz wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Author: kuemmel Date: Sat Dec 30 15:50:45 2006 New Revision: 16441 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16441 Log: add more lyxerr output, don't use a reference (maybe stdlib-debug has problems with it) IMHO "maybe" is not a good excuse to slo

Re: [Cvslog] r16441 - /lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/QToc.C

2007-01-03 Thread Michael Gerz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Author: kuemmel Date: Sat Dec 30 15:50:45 2006 New Revision: 16441 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16441 Log: add more lyxerr output, don't use a reference (maybe stdlib-debug has problems with it) Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/QToc.C Modifi