Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I guess we'll end up with a beautiful version using latest technology
| which won't fix the original problem (speed) but would look much nicer
| than any pragmatic and working solution.
I am not quite sure what high horse you have saddled yourself upon,
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > (I notice that scrolling the UserGuide is
> > quite fluently, as long as no graphics or previews are involved [1]).
>
> You mean it is better or slower than without the patch?
No, it's completely unrelated. I just noticed it while testing the patch.
Jürgen
Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
Georg Baum wrote:
This patch compiles for 1.4
Yes. Compiles, runs and feels good.
What specifically should we test for
Paragraph insertion/deletion (especially around graphics), Undo/Redo,
Cut&Paste inside/outside insets, export*, navigate.
Navigating when the
Georg Baum wrote:
> This patch compiles for 1.4
Yes. Compiles, runs and feels good.
What specifically should we test for (I notice that scrolling the UserGuide is
quite fluently, as long as no graphics or previews are involved [1]).
Jürgen
[1] It appears to me that in 1.3, the graphics and prev
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 09:25:09AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Funny that you are doing the exact same changes as my original patch
> fixing the code to use std::distance and std::advance (in this case
> boost::next). You rejected my patch exactly because of this... I am not
> upset but yo
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
>
> | The problem were missing conversions of
> |
> | pars.begin() + x
> |
> | to
> |
> | boost::next(pars.begin(), x)
>
> Where were they missing?
In some cut and paste code that does no longer exist in 1.5. BTW my patch
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Ok, this is what I am going to commit.
|
| Lars> I am not really happy with the fact that RandomListIterator
| Lars> really is a std::list<>::iterator. I'd like it to be a
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Am Montag, 20. März 2006 20:16 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
| > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| > > Juergen> It does not compile as is (not that I tried too hard).
| > >
| > > I suspect it works with --disable-concept-checks.
| >
| > No, it doesn't. I'm try
Am Montag, 20. März 2006 20:16 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Juergen> It does not compile as is (not that I tried too hard).
> >
> > I suspect it works with --disable-concept-checks.
>
> No, it doesn't. I'm trying with --disable-pch later, but I have to leave
now
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen> It does not compile as is (not that I tried too hard).
>
> I suspect it works with --disable-concept-checks.
No, it doesn't. I'm trying with --disable-pch later, but I have to leave now.
Jürgen
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi Lars,
|
| Funny that you are doing the exact same changes as my original patch
| fixing the code to use std::distance and std::advance (in this case
| boost::next). You rejected my patch exactly because of this...
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi Lars,
|
| Funny that you are doing the exact same changes as my original patch
| fixing the code to use std::distance and std::advance (in this case
| boost::next). You rejected my patch exactly because of this...
If you made the exact same chan
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I'd be interested to have people test it in 1.4 too.
Juergen> It does not compile as is (not that I tried too hard).
I suspect it works with --disable-concept-checks.
JMarc
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Ok, this is what I am going to commit.
Lars> I am not really happy with the fact that RandomListIterator
Lars> really is a std::list<>::iterator. I'd like it to be a real
Lars> random_access_iterator. We should probably create
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I'd be interested to have people test it in 1.4 too.
It does not compile as is (not that I tried too hard).
Jürgen
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Ok, this is what I am going to commit.
Lars> I am not really happy with the fact that RandomListIterator
Lars> really is a std::list<>::iterator. I'd like it to be a real
Lars> random_access_iterator. We should probably create
Hi Lars,
Funny that you are doing the exact same changes as my original patch
fixing the code to use std::distance and std::advance (in this case
boost::next). You rejected my patch exactly because of this... I am not
upset but you could have told me at the beginning instead of letting me
was
Ok, this is what I am going to commit.
I am not really happy with the fact that RandomListIterator really is
a std::list<>::iterator. I'd like it to be a real
random_access_iterator. We should probably create our own. (And no; I
don't agree that we should only work with offsets and indices,
iter
18 matches
Mail list logo
