On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 03:48:39PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> You should define a NoWeb->Program converter, when the converter field is
> "noweb_build $$i", and the flags field is "originaldir,parselog=listerrors g",
> and the noweb_build script should be something like
>
> #!/bin/sh
> cp $1 .
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 09:20:08AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello Lyx Developers,
>
> As per the request of Jean-Marc, I am sending this bug report that both
> Edmar and I experienced. It concerns building the program code of
> a literate program using Lyx. Here is our discussion of th
I've been extensively using the LyX/Literate combination for some time
and have never seen this behavior before.
Do you have a recipe for reproducing this?
---Kayvan
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 09:20:08AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello Lyx Developers,
>
> As per th
Hello Lyx Developers,
As per the request of Jean-Marc, I am sending this bug report that both
Edmar and I experienced. It concerns building the program code of
a literate program using Lyx. Here is our discussion of the bug:
> >> Another anomality is that if the directory is clean, i.e., no ot
Edmar> Hi Lars. I worked on the literate programming extension for LyX
Edmar> a while back (LyX-1.0.1). Unfortunately political trends here
Edmar> at my job shifted and it is a long time I don't have
Edmar> opportunity to use this feature.
Hi Edmar, nice to hear from you again.
Edmar> Anyway...
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Hi Lars. I worked on the literate programming extension for LyX
Lars> a while back (LyX-1.0.1). Unfortunately political trends here at
Lars> my job shifted and it is a long time I don't have opportunity to
Lars> use this featur
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 18-Sep-2000 Allan Rae wrote:
> >
> > I'm sure we've had more than occasion where contributors have forgotten
> > those new files simply because they expected diff would add the new files
> > to the patch for them. Sure they should have checked thei
On 18-Sep-2000 Allan Rae wrote:
>
> I'm sure we've had more than occasion where contributors have forgotten
> those new files simply because they expected diff would add the new files
> to the patch for them. Sure they should have checked their patch and
> noticed this but getting a patch and a
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >
> > Nothing, as I said above in the first case. The only problem comes with
> > the fact that new files are not included by the -N. Only new files that
> > have been added to cvs using `cvs add` are actually caught by the -N flag.
> > To be able to
>
> Nothing, as I said above in the first case. The only problem comes with
> the fact that new files are not included by the -N. Only new files that
> have been added to cvs using `cvs add` are actually caught by the -N flag.
> To be able to run `cvs add` you have to be given at least read-onl
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > So in summary:
> > If you have cvs access but no new files use
> > `cvs diff -p -N -u`
> >
> > if you have no cvs access (using snapshots or releases) _or_ have cvs
> > access but have added new files then get the modi
Allan Rae wrote:
> So in summary:
> If you have cvs access but no new files use
> `cvs diff -p -N -u`
>
> if you have no cvs access (using snapshots or releases) _or_ have cvs
> access but have added new files then get the modified diff and a script
> called packcvs from the above site
My question is how we submit patches nowadays. I couldn't find the
familiar script to diff two source trees... (Yeah, it's being a long
time...)
Makepatch doesn't exist anymore. Everyone is expected to use cvs to build
patches against the latest cvs not against fix releases. Although if you
Hi Lars.
I worked on the literate programming extension for LyX a while back
(LyX-1.0.1). Unfortunately political trends here at my job shifted
and
it is a long time I don't have opportunity to use this feature.
Then, on July one guy sent me email saying it was broken. In fact
it
was, but it is
14 matches
Mail list logo
