Re: #ifdef THIS_DOES_NOT_WORK

2001-12-05 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 03:21:22PM +1300, Michael Koziarski wrote: > 451296 redo is losing text > > as well. I was looking at this one a while back. actually, that should be fixed now ? john -- "Faced with the prospect of rereading this book, I would rather have my brains ripped out by a

Re: #ifdef THIS_DOES_NOT_WORK

2001-12-05 Thread Michael Koziarski
At 01:58 AM 12/6/01 +, John Levon wrote: >in undo_funcs.C::textHandleUndo. Why doesn't it work ? Its comment >seems to imply it needs enabling to fix : > >451273 tables-in-tables, redo, and size updates > >and > >451272 Note inset and undo background problem I think it also needs enabling

#ifdef THIS_DOES_NOT_WORK

2001-12-05 Thread John Levon
in undo_funcs.C::textHandleUndo. Why doesn't it work ? Its comment seems to imply it needs enabling to fix : 451273 tables-in-tables, redo, and size updates and 451272 Note inset and undo background problem ?? thanks john -- "Faced with the prospect of rereading this book, I would rather