> >I can understand that. But do you think there will still be a
> >window-manager-independent version of Lyx like there is today?
>
> What do you mean - I know several people using _KLyX_ on fvwm2 :-)
I now understand that is possible. Thanks.
Scott Johnston
> The route we are trying to take is to have a tk-independent LyX
> core, and let people develop native frontends on top of that. It is
> clear that KDE people, for example, would not want something which
> looks like a KDE app, but something which *is* a KDE app.
I can understand that. But do y
look-and-feel, evolved from SGI-Motif, with native cross-platform
support (Windows-NT, Unix/X11, Macintosh).
You can read more about the history of these toolkits at
http://www.vectaport.com/ivtools/interviews.html.
Scott Johnston
Vectaport Inc.
http://www.vectaport.com
