Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, we have had this complaint for a long time. I did find some
> problems at the time, but fixing them was obviously not enough.
As far as I can tell, it always crashes at the same point for me.
> Thomas> * dual head without xinerama (obviousl
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have had reports of this kind some time ago already, but did not
> manage to identify and fix the problem. Can you run xforms programs
> (ie fdesign) succesfully?
I don't have fdesign, but I tested xplot and xwatch, which work
without any prob
Hi,
it seems I found a strange bug in LyX when used on the second of two X
screens.
When I start X on the main screen (:0.0), everything is fine. But when
I start on the second screen of my dual screen setup (:0.1), it
crashes as soon as I open a new or an existing file. So I suppose it
could be
Hi,
I would like to compile lyx for libc5 (aout), so that I can use it
with mulinux. gcc 2.7.2 is the latest compiler with support for libc5.
Should that be possible in general?
AFAIC autoconf works ok up the configuration of libsigc++. According
to the website of libsigc++, it cannot be compile
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> any comments to the gui?
Seems ok, I especially like the "Scale %" thing.
How is the "% of column width" handled? Is it in Width/Height? Maybe
all the scaling could be combined?
And I don't quite like the |#x lables. They just look a bit messy.
Yo
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> an euro, but I'm not able to insert it with the keyboard.
> in all insets, like label, figure a.s.o., I get the currency
> symbol with AltGr-e (the sputnik) which becomes after closing the
> inset window the eurosign. but in lyx main-gui -> nothing
What
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> and for years, people have been forced to go to the manual to work out
^ some
> how to enter lengths. More recently, we have had a vague help message
> in some places.
Other people have entered length just as they always did.
> The new i
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> why should I do a lyx->latex->lyx cycle?
>>
>> You need it if you work on a document with a coauthor which doesn't have LyX.
>
> this is the only reason??
It is the only reason for doing the cycle I can see. Having said that,
interoperability in gen
Uli Sorger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First, I'd like to have better large document support.
Indeed. A folding mode would be cute...
> With TeX parts the document can be typeset using the \includeonly (?)
> command with correct cross references.
You can typeset even "part" documents in la
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> but anyway, why can't you use the lyx math panel?
Fascinating idea. I hadn't thought that might to any good, but it
does. The math panel uses \widetilde, which solves the problem.
So the bug is still there, but at least I have a workaround.
Now if we
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> try \tilde{}\overline{x}
Which produces the same result, at least here. I can only produce the
above sequence editing the lyx-file by hand.
If I try to enter that construct using
\tilde{ \overline{ x
I get a very weird looking formula, which leads
Hi,
I discovered a bug in math mode. If you enter (in math mode)
\tilde \overline{x
you actually get
\overline{\tilde\{x}}
The same happens when a document is read, where the above sequence
appears. Since there is no LaTeX limitation concerning either form, I
believe this to be a bug. (It i
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, in general, it is impossible to be backward compatible always.
> By this I mean that changes to the file format cannot possibly be
> backward compatible.
Yes, I understand that. And I am the last person to complain about a
change to the better,
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not sure anybody promised backward compatability... Anyway, it's not
> going to happen! Forward compatibility is Ok.
Beg to differ. Forward compatibility is a must and therefore not worth
mentioning. Backward compatibility is nice to have, and I w
Hello,
I use LyX 1.1.4fix3 at home and LyX 1.1.5fix2 at work, that is i386
GNU/Linux Debian Potato and a current Debian Woody. Works like a
charm, but: LyX 1.1.5 writes a construct that breaks 1.1.4:
\layout Description
a\SpecialChar ~
b c
LyX 1.1.4 expects:
\layout Description
a\proctected
m, which also includes the
necessary libraries. german nationalisation.
PS: lyx is great, but one feature is missing: scaling images. say you
want 50% of the original .eps size, there's no way to do that. maybe
you can add a button...
Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(C)
16 matches
Mail list logo
