On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> 11/03/2014 10:10, Roy Xia:
>
> Hi everyone,
>>
>> So I've been studying the converter scheme in pursuit of the
>> aforementioned project suggestion. I've been mostly focusing on the
>> part
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Also, is the ->accept() call that causes the change to become permanent on
> disk, or what ?
>
As Richard said, the accept() call seems only to close the dialog where you
input your shortcut. Moving it to after the overriding logic keep
more light on this subject for me, or make sure
my thinking isn't totally off track.
Finally after all of those changes are in place there would probably need
to be some UI changes to reflect the modified converter scheme, but I think
that's more of an afterthought.
Thanks for reading all of that and I appreciate any advice you have to
spare.
Roy Xia
I hereby license my contributions to LyX under the General Public License,
Version 2 or any later version.
Roy Xia
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 03/08/2014 08:35 PM, Roy Xia wrote:
>
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> I'm a student interested in working with LyX for Google Summer of Code
>> 2014, mostly looking towards overhauling the LyX converter scheme as
bit further and implement the
comment's suggestion of a user dialog on whether to overwrite the shortcut
or not. Not sure if that was the consensus on the appropriate behavior or
not, but if not then most of the diff patch can be ignored. Sorry in
advance if there are any mistakes in the patc
