[PATCH] Use a while() loop instead of fighting against for()

Hi, Since I am not able to run or even understand a minted test, I'll like some feedback about this (straightforward?) patch. Does it make sense? It was spotted by Coverity Scan. JMarc From 2a97a951901cd5efaede2dca19b873d71910d31d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: Th

Re: [LyX/2.4.x] Backport 2a771febd1a (last fix for #12819 - check for deleted documents)

Le 08/02/2025 à 18:56, Pavel Sanda a écrit : commit c8319a1f7e434b9cf55802a70d6cdad8facbf377 Author: Pavel Sanda Date: Sat Feb 8 18:55:00 2025 +0100 Backport 2a771febd1a (last fix for #12819 - check for deleted documents) --- src/Buffer.cpp | 28 status.24

Re: [PATCH] Use a while() loop instead of fighting against for()

On 2/19/25 6:24 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Hi, Since I am not able to run or even understand a minted test, I'll like some feedback about this (straightforward?) patch. I don't use minted either, but the patch looks right to me. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org h