Re: [for enrico] Question: do we still need that?

2024-08-28 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 04:48:16PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 28/08/2024 à 15:54, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : In createAppplication, we have: #if !defined(QPA_XCB) // prune -geometry argument(s) by shifting // the following ones 2 places down. for (int i = 0 ; i < argc

Re: [for enrico] Question: do we still need that?

2024-08-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 28/08/2024 à 15:54, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : In createAppplication, we have: #if !defined(QPA_XCB) // prune -geometry argument(s) by shifting // the following ones 2 places down. for (int i = 0 ; i < argc ; ++i) {     if (strcmp(argv[i], "-geometry") == 0) {    

[for enrico] Question: do we still need that?

2024-08-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
In createAppplication, we have: #if !defined(QPA_XCB) // prune -geometry argument(s) by shifting // the following ones 2 places down. for (int i = 0 ; i < argc ; ++i) { if (strcmp(argv[i], "-geometry") == 0) { int const remove = (i+1

Re: ctests failing on current master

2024-08-28 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Tue, 27 Aug 2024 22:21:35 +0200 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > The following tests are failing for me on current master. Note that I haven't > updated > my TeX Live distribution for a couple of months. And I saw a couple of notes > mentioning > the new babel system so perhaps I just need to upda