Re: Unbinding Alt-1 Does Not Work

2024-06-03 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 6/3/24 16:34, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 6/3/24 15:55, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: A user reported that many of his custom shortcuts were not working. These used Alt-1, etc, as a prefix (e.g., Alt-1 M). Because 2.4 now binds Alt-NUM to "Save bookmark NUM", that is not a surprise. What

Re: Unbinding Alt-1 Does Not Work

2024-06-03 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 6/3/24 15:55, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: A user reported that many of his custom shortcuts were not working. These used Alt-1, etc, as a prefix (e.g., Alt-1 M). Because 2.4 now binds Alt-NUM to "Save bookmark NUM", that is not a surprise. What is a surprise is that it does not seem possibl

Unbinding Alt-1 Does Not Work

2024-06-03 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
A user reported that many of his custom shortcuts were not working. These used Alt-1, etc, as a prefix (e.g., Alt-1 M). Because 2.4 now binds Alt-NUM to "Save bookmark NUM", that is not a surprise. What is a surprise is that it does not seem possible to unbind this. Even if I unbind Alt-9, say,

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

2024-06-03 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 12:50:48AM GMT, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:05:01PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > Occassionally I see someone (maybe Enrico or JMarc?) mention they > > checked something on a very old version of LyX to see if some behavior > > is how it's a

Re: Merge

2024-06-03 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 6/3/24 03:04, José Matos wrote: On Sun, 2024-06-02 at 22:53 -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: I've merged 2.4.x into 2.4.1-devel. I should have been  doing this periodically but didn't. There were quite a few conflicts, unsurprisingly. I believe I have resolved them all properly, and I've s

Re: [LyX/master] Update layouts

2024-06-03 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Montag, dem 03.06.2024 um 16:00 +0100 schrieb José Matos: > So I think that for the moment a pragmatic solution is to always > update > the layouts when updating the layout format. By reviewing the changes > we can ensure that the update code does what it should. I might have misunderstood the

Re: [LyX/master] Update layouts

2024-06-03 Thread José Matos
On Mon, 2024-06-03 at 16:15 +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Hm, I intentionally held that back unless we fix the problem > discussed at https://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel&m=171733833610242&w=2 IMHO I think that for the moment the right approach is really to update the layouts. :-) The optimization

Re: [LyX/master] Update layouts

2024-06-03 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 04:15:21PM GMT, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Montag, dem 03.06.2024 um 02:53 + schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > commit 7c041af6425001d7779f5e44d72918d8591ea37d > > Author: Scott Kostyshak > > Date:   Sun Jun 2 22:52:37 2024 -0400 > > > >     Update layouts > > Hm, I int

Re: [LyX/master] Update layouts

2024-06-03 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Montag, dem 03.06.2024 um 02:53 + schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > commit 7c041af6425001d7779f5e44d72918d8591ea37d > Author: Scott Kostyshak > Date:   Sun Jun 2 22:52:37 2024 -0400 > >     Update layouts Hm, I intentionally held that back unless we fix the problem discussed at https://marc.info

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

2024-06-03 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 12:02:03AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > This could go either to our wiki (with deps and packages into > > wiki-uploads.git) > > or it could go into https://www.lyx.org/misc/archaeology/ > > (www-user.git:/misc/archaeology/), up to you. > > Please, explain how to do

Re: Website Translations

2024-06-03 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 12:47:55PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Apparently, the German version of the "additional software" page on our > website still recommends MiKTeX for Windows. It looks like the Spanish > version also does so. In any event, the point is that it's out of sync with > t

Re: Merge

2024-06-03 Thread José Matos
On Sun, 2024-06-02 at 22:53 -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > I've merged 2.4.x into 2.4.1-devel. I should have been  doing this > periodically but didn't. There were quite a few conflicts, > unsurprisingly. I believe I have resolved them all properly, and I've > spot-checked several commits.