On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 12:28:03AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 11:07:00AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > I get the following error on master:
> >
> > ! Undefined control sequence.
> > \lyxmathsym
> >
> > l.276 $\lyxmathsym
> >{\underba
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 11:07:00AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
I get the following error on master:
! Undefined control sequence.
\lyxmathsym
l.276 $\lyxmathsym
{\underbar{a}}$ &
Should be fixed at 039de52a.
--
Enrico
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.or
Le 08/11/2023 à 19:41, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
On 11/8/23 10:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 07/11/2023 à 18:03, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
I think these must be safe. They have all been in master for three
years.
I had a better idea: let's mute these warnings about future C++
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 06:09:44PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 22/11/2022 ?? 03:04, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> >On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 01:47:26AM +, José Matos wrote:
> >>On Mon, 2022-11-21 at 23:08 +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >>>Can you try whether the attached changes anything? P
>
On 11/8/23 10:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 07/11/2023 à 18:03, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
I think these must be safe. They have all been in master for three
years.
I had a better idea: let's mute these warnings about future C++
versions, since we limit ourselves to C++14 in 2.3.X a
Le 22/11/2022 à 03:04, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 01:47:26AM +, José Matos wrote:
On Mon, 2022-11-21 at 23:08 +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Can you try whether the attached changes anything? P
It does, now those attached are what remains.
Nice, so now we know the culprit.
I get the following error on master:
! Undefined control sequence.
\lyxmathsym
l.276 $\lyxmathsym
{\underbar{a}}$ &
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/m
Le 07/11/2023 à 18:03, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
I think these must be safe. They have all been in master for three years.
I had a better idea: let's mute these warnings about future C++
versions, since we limit ourselves to C++14 in 2.3.X anyway.
Does the patch below seem OK?
JMarc
F
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 01:23:35PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Possible collision are easily handled by recursive
> hash(hash(..(hash(string))),
> see attached patch.
Polished patch attached. I will do some more testing before committing to the
tree.
Pavel
diff --git a/src/insets/InsetGraphics.
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 08:31:23AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >These will not get distributed to tarball unless added to makefiles.
>
> Adding them to src/Makefile.am is not sufficient?
It is, I didn't see it in the diff, athough I see it now :) Sorry. Pavel
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-
10 matches
Mail list logo