Re: QRegExp is deprecated in qt6

2023-03-02 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Thu, 2 Mar 2023 21:31:44 +0100 schrieb Enrico Forestieri : > On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 03:57:38PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >Le 20/02/2023 à 17:47, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : > > > >>What I do not know is whether we can get rid of QtCore5Compat > >>library. Is it useful for anyt

Re: QRegExp is deprecated in qt6

2023-03-02 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 3/2/23 17:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 02/03/2023 à 23:10, Stephan Witt a écrit : Am 02.03.2023 um 22:44 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : On 3/2/23 12:29, Stephan Witt wrote: ATM, Qt6 is unusable on Mac because of bug 12641. :( Does this just mean you can't build with Qt6? Or is th

Re: QRegExp is deprecated in qt6

2023-03-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 02/03/2023 à 17:41, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Luckily it seems that GuiKeySymbol is the only code that uses QTextCodec. Luckily enough, the code in there is inside #if 0 ... #endif :) JMarc -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-dev

Re: QRegExp is deprecated in qt6

2023-03-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 02/03/2023 à 23:10, Stephan Witt a écrit : Am 02.03.2023 um 22:44 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : On 3/2/23 12:29, Stephan Witt wrote: ATM, Qt6 is unusable on Mac because of bug 12641. :( Does this just mean you can't build with Qt6? Or is this a blocker for release? No, this means I c

Re: QRegExp is deprecated in qt6

2023-03-02 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 02.03.2023 um 22:44 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > > On 3/2/23 12:29, Stephan Witt wrote: >> >> ATM, Qt6 is unusable on Mac because of bug 12641. :( > > Does this just mean you can't build with Qt6? Or is this a blocker for > release? No, this means I can build both with Qt5 or Qt6. But

Re: QRegExp is deprecated in qt6

2023-03-02 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 3/2/23 12:29, Stephan Witt wrote: ATM, Qt6 is unusable on Mac because of bug 12641. :( Does this just mean you can't build with Qt6? Or is this a blocker for release? Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: QRegExp is deprecated in qt6

2023-03-02 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 03:57:38PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 20/02/2023 à 17:47, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : What I do not know is whether we can get rid of QtCore5Compat library. Is it useful for anything beyond QRegExp? Enrico, Stephan Kornel, do you know something about need

Re: [LyX/master] Spellcheck - more verbose tooltip.

2023-03-02 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 08:59:17PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > commit 96eb65dc32bb57333462477004b17d01b1e6a2fd > Author: Pavel Sanda > Date: Thu Mar 2 22:01:17 2023 +0100 > > Spellcheck - more verbose tooltip. > --- > src/frontends/qt/ui/SpellcheckerUi.ui |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 in

Re: QRegExp is deprecated in qt6

2023-03-02 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 02.03.2023 um 15:57 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > Le 20/02/2023 à 17:47, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >> Le 13/02/2023 à 21:29, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : > Indeed! So we should get rid of QRegexp now. Riki, would that be OK? What I have in mind is that whatever bug w

Re: QRegExp is deprecated in qt6

2023-03-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 02/03/2023 à 17:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : With CMake build I get /usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/frontends/qt/GuiKeySymbol.cpp:28:10: fatal error: QTextCodec: No such file or directory 28 | #include | ^~~~ compilation terminated. if I remove the QtCore5Compat parts.

Re: QRegExp is deprecated in qt6

2023-03-02 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:34:49AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mon, 20 Feb 2023 17:47:29 +0100 > schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > > Le 13/02/2023 à 21:29, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : > > >>> Indeed! So we should get rid of QRegexp now. > > >> > > >> Riki, would that be OK? What I have

Re: QRegExp is deprecated in qt6

2023-03-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 20/02/2023 à 17:47, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 13/02/2023 à 21:29, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : Indeed! So we should get rid of QRegexp now. Riki, would that be OK? What I have in mind is that whatever bug with this newer code will be found earlier if more users are running it.