Re: [RFC] Acknowledgment theorem type

2023-02-05 Thread José Matos
On Sun, 2023-02-05 at 16:30 +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Very good. Now I hope I won't have to read the word "acknowledgment" > for some time ... Markdown example: """ # How to properly handle a file format change ## Identify the changes ### Acknowledgment The LyX developers and us

Re: Beta 2?

2023-02-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 10/01/2023 à 22:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Right. Something I will ask for soon is permission for upgrading included boost on devel and stable. It is not possible to build stable without lots of warnings these days. So, I upgraded boost to 1.81 (latest) in master and 1.75 in stabl

Re: [RFC] Acknowledgment theorem type

2023-02-05 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 2/5/23 10:28, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Sonntag, dem 05.02.2023 um 10:10 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Re-ran all the tests and they all pass for me now on current master. Thank you so much, I really appreciate the time and effort you put into this. Seconded. Riki -- lyx-devel maili

Re: [RFC] Acknowledgment theorem type

2023-02-05 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 04:28:13PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Sonntag, dem 05.02.2023 um 10:10 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > Re-ran all the tests and they all pass for me now on current master. > > Thank you so much, I really appreciate the time and effort you put into > this. Tha

Re: [RFC] Acknowledgment theorem type

2023-02-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Sonntag, dem 05.02.2023 um 16:28 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Here, all these export tests pass. Very good. Now I hope I won't have to read the word "acknowledgment" for some time ... -- Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- lyx-devel mailing list ly

Re: [RFC] Acknowledgment theorem type

2023-02-05 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 5 Feb 2023 10:10:03 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 12:09:57PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Samstag, dem 04.02.2023 um 13:31 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly > > Heck: > > > > I'll do that and add a routine that adds the style to local layout > > > > in

Re: [RFC] Acknowledgment theorem type

2023-02-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Sonntag, dem 05.02.2023 um 10:10 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > Re-ran all the tests and they all pass for me now on current master. Thank you so much, I really appreciate the time and effort you put into this. -- Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -

Re: [RFC] Acknowledgment theorem type

2023-02-05 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 12:09:57PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Samstag, dem 04.02.2023 um 13:31 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly > Heck: > > > I'll do that and add a routine that adds the style to local layout > > > in > > > the probably seldom case it is used. > > > > Fine by me. > > Don

Re: [RFC] Acknowledgment theorem type

2023-02-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Samstag, dem 04.02.2023 um 13:31 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > > I'll do that and add a routine that adds the style to local layout > > in > > the probably seldom case it is used. > > Fine by me. Done. Scott, it will probably be good to re-run the tests to check whether there are gli

Re: [LyX/master] Acknowledgement > Acknowledgment

2023-02-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Samstag, dem 04.02.2023 um 13:29 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > The following tests FAILED: >     6524 - > export/templates/Articles/International_Union_of_Crystallography_%28I > UCr%29_lyx16 (Failed) >     6525 - > export/templates/Articles/International_Union_of_Crystallography_%28I