On Fri, 2023-02-03 at 17:20 +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Agreed, the disambiguation is apparently not needed. Pavel
I agree as well.
Although the texts I read are more applied I did not remember to have
find any such theorem style before... so it seems that in this regard
we are all sane. :-)
--
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 04:10:21PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Considering the clarification below, I think I will revert the
> disambiguation and only keep the adaptation to US spelling.
Agreed, the disambiguation is apparently not needed. Pavel
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.l
Am Donnerstag, dem 02.02.2023 um 16:32 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> By "all", I was referring to the tests that had failed before. Not to
> all tests.
How could I have hoped for this?
> I just reran the whole test suite and there are other failures:
Shoot. This means we'll need a file format
Considering the clarification below, I think I will revert the
disambiguation and only keep the adaptation to US spelling. This will
also make it easier to implement the file format change which we need
to cure the latest problems Scott revealed.
Objections?
Jürgen
--- Weitergeleitete Nachri
On 2023-02-03 01:18, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 2/2/23 17:31, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 02/02/2023 à 23:12, Daniel a écrit :
The problem is when the depencies/exclusion graph contains
furstrated loops. Something like
- one has B, which provides feature "foo"
- want to insert A, whic
