Am Wed, 11 Jan 2023 06:55:11 +0100
schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Wed, 11 Jan 2023 01:12:40 +0100
> schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier :
>
> > > Still
> > > Error: Bad value "content-type" for attribute "http-equiv" on
> > > element
> > > "meta".
> > >
> > > Should we ignore this error?
> > >
> >
Am Wed, 11 Jan 2023 01:12:40 +0100
schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier :
> > Still
> > Error: Bad value "content-type" for attribute "http-equiv" on
> > element "meta".
> >
> > Should we ignore this error?
> >
> I don't think we should ignore it. It really seems to be platform-dependent
> (either
Am Dienstag, dem 10.01.2023 um 20:11 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
> We have lexicographic ordering, right?
> https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/string/basic_string/operator_cmp
>
> How would we sort strings otherwise?
Oh, I never thought about that.
Still, I think the current method is mor
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 00:15, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 at 04:11, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
>> I'll paste the errors at the bottom of this message. Thibaut, is this
>> related to recent work?
>>
>
> It's highly likely, I'm having a look!
>
That problem should be fixed at
fb70
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 at 04:11, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I'll paste the errors at the bottom of this message. Thibaut, is this
> related to recent work?
>
It's highly likely, I'm having a look!
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Right.
Something I will ask for soon is permission for upgrading included boost on
devel and stable. It is not possible to build stable without lots of warnings
these days.
JMarc
Le 10 janvier 2023 21:50:06 GMT+01:00, Richard Kimberly Heck
a écrit :
>Seem like a good time to do beta 2?
>
>R
Seem like a good time to do beta 2?
Riki
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:46:08AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 10/01/2023 à 03:42, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > The attached patch works around an AMS book unicode issue, as discussed
> > here:
> >
> >
> > https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/671116/how-to-find-and-fix-the-ori
We have lexicographic ordering, right?
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/string/basic_string/operator_cmp
How would we sort strings otherwise?
JMarc
Le 10 janvier 2023 18:34:15 GMT+01:00, "Jürgen Spitzmüller"
a écrit :
>Maybe I miss something obvious, but I thought strings can only be
>compa
Am Dienstag, dem 10.01.2023 um 17:28 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
> Am I wrong that
> "2015/10/01" >= "2014/06/01"
> ?
>
> I may be missing something obvious.
Maybe I miss something obvious, but I thought strings can only be
compared for equality (== or !=) not size difference (unless you
Am Dienstag, dem 10.01.2023 um 16:08 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
> and in the 'magic' use of \@parse@command in chkconfig.ltx
That's a command from the LaTeX kernel that can parse a LaTeX package
string, strip the name and anything expect for the date and can also
handle different date for
Le 10/01/2023 à 17:26, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Sonntag, dem 08.01.2023 um 19:49 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Is there a reason why we need that instead of comparing dates as
string?
Something like
if (package_date >= "2015/09/01") {
[...]
How would "com
Am Sonntag, dem 08.01.2023 um 19:49 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Is there a reason why we need that instead of comparing dates as
> string?
> Something like
> if (package_date >= "2015/09/01") {
> [...]
How would "comparing dates as strings" work? Wouldn't we need
Le 08/01/2023 à 19:49, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
For some reason (maybe because I am in C++11 mode) the eatLine() does
not grab the potential second part of the line, but the package name in
the next line.
OK, ignore that. It turns out I had an old version of chkconfig.ltx in
my ~/.lyx d
On Tue, 2023-01-10 at 11:36 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 10/01/2023 à 11:23, Patrick Dupre a écrit :
> > Yes, I can share it.
> > Not sure about the exact result !
>
> Hi there,
>
> This LyX 1.0 file from Patrick is not readable with current versions.
> Experiments show that lyx2lyx fi
Le 10/01/2023 à 03:42, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
The attached patch works around an AMS book unicode issue, as discussed here:
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/671116/how-to-find-and-fix-the-origin-of-invalid-unicode-character-generated-by-lyx
Disadvantage of the workaround is the ad
Le 10/01/2023 à 11:23, Patrick Dupre a écrit :
Yes, I can share it.
Not sure about the exact result !
Hi there,
This LyX 1.0 file from Patrick is not readable with current versions.
Experiments show that lyx2lyx first complains about a malformed file
when converting to LyX 1.4.
I do not kn
No, I am asking because it might not be working for others if it
is not working for me, so I though I'd report it. And have a look
at it while I am there).
el
On 10/01/2023 03:41, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 09.01.2023 um 23:25 schrieb Dr Eberhard W Lisse :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just saw the lyx-maxima
18 matches
Mail list logo
