On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 21:53, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 29/10/2021 à 21:37, Thibaut Cuvelier a écrit :
> > Dear list,
> >
> > I've just received this report. However, the dereferencing has been
> > taken care of within a LASSERT. What do you suggest I do? It would be
> > best to avoid that
Le 29/10/2021 à 21:37, Thibaut Cuvelier a écrit :
Dear list,
I've just received this report. However, the dereferencing has been
taken care of within a LASSERT. What do you suggest I do? It would be
best to avoid that this report comes again, so I think something must be
done.
Hello Thibaut
Dear list,
I've just received this report. However, the dereferencing has been taken
care of within a LASSERT. What do you suggest I do? It would be best to
avoid that this report comes again, so I think something must be done.
The least clean option seems to unroll the macro in the code (calling
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 12:13:29PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> See the attached example and the screenshot that shows the differences in
> vertical spacing when the document is compiled with 2.3.x and with master.
>
> It looks like there are two places where master has an additional line of
Le 29/10/2021 à 16:50, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Freitag, dem 29.10.2021 um 16:17 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
commit 5c055034c2076160bcb6ea7ae6d42de694cc2ca7
Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Date: Fri Oct 29 16:38:29 2021 +0200
Fixup b0c102cfb: make it possible to select medsk
Am Freitag, dem 29.10.2021 um 16:17 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> commit 5c055034c2076160bcb6ea7ae6d42de694cc2ca7
> Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Date: Fri Oct 29 16:38:29 2021 +0200
>
> Fixup b0c102cfb: make it possible to select medskip as parskip
>
> Some new parskip po
