Riki,
can you make it read 2.4 format?
el
On 2020-10-30 00:03 , Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> Now that the development testing release is all but out, it is probably
> also time to do another 2.3.x release. We have a few crash fixes, and
> the last release was in June. So: Anythi
This is most certainly the worst possible "fix".
One should fix menukeys.
One should figure out where and why LyX pulls menukeys and turn that
off, reverting to the situation before menukeys was used.
One should figure out how to make LyX place the
\RequirePackage[2020-02-02]{latexrelease} as th
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:07:28PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Thursday, October 29, 2020 2:54:39 PM WET Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Should we just write a LyX note inside the .lyx file that if they get an
> > error they should export to .tex and put
> > \RequirePackage[2020-02-02]{latexrel
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:54:56PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 01:03:58PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Sat, 24 Oct 2020 01:16:54 -0400
> > schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> >
> > > This document compiles for me on an older system (with TL19) but on a
> > > new installati
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 09:09:24PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 10/29/20 8:39 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:03:58PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> >
> >> So: Anything anyone wants to get into
> >> 2.3.6 before we freeze strings?
> > Can I backport fe1c
On 10/29/20 8:39 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:03:58PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>
>> So: Anything anyone wants to get into
>> 2.3.6 before we freeze strings?
> Can I backport fe1cbc06 and 334552ad to 2.3.x? I think that Kornel and I
> are the only ones who use t
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:03:58PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> So: Anything anyone wants to get into
> 2.3.6 before we freeze strings?
Can I backport fe1cbc06 and 334552ad to 2.3.x? I think that Kornel and I
are the only ones who use the cpack deb feature.
Scott
signature.asc
Descrip
Hi, everyone,
We are beginning the process of moving towards the next major release of
LyX, which will be 2.4.0. Toward that end, we have prepared a 'testing'
release. Please note that this is very much for testing. We do not
necessarily recommend that anyone use it for daily work, although some
o
Hi, all,
Now that the development testing release is all but out, it is probably
also time to do another 2.3.x release. We have a few crash fixes, and
the last release was in June. So: Anything anyone wants to get into
2.3.6 before we freeze strings?
A couple bugs that have only been fixed in mas
On Thursday, October 29, 2020 12:26:14 AM WET Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> I wasn't officially releasing it as an alpha and won't announce it that
> way. We had not, so far as I am aware, made any official determination
> about that (although Pavel suggested it). So, for now, it'll be
> announced
On Thursday, October 29, 2020 2:54:39 PM WET Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Should we just write a LyX note inside the .lyx file that if they get an
> error they should export to .tex and put
> \RequirePackage[2020-02-02]{latexrelease} as the first line?
>
> Scott
That seems a sensible thing to do IMHO
I have killed all those stale connections. Hopefully that will help. (I
will guess that the working IP for some reason had an open connection.)
First and foremost: this solved it, and now it works. Thank you again!
Now, the embarrassing part: from your logs we found out that the
unique working
On 10/29/20 9:27 AM, Marco Morandini wrote:
I have killed all those stale connections. Hopefully that will help. (I
will guess that the working IP for some reason had an open connection.)
First and foremost: this solved it, and now it works. Thank you again!
Now, the embarrassing part: from yo
Our seminar example fails with an updated TeX Live 2020 system. The
maintainer states the following:
it is a problem with the new hook management of the current latex.ltx
seminar is a quite old package and there is no reason to use it with a
new LaTeX format. It won't be fixed, so the usual
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 05:16:06PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 05:17:29PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 09:05:36PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> > > On Saturday, October 24, 2020 5:57:50 PM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > Thanks. Not s
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 01:29:11PM +0200, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> Scott,
>
> please let me have a MWE, as I reported the menukeys issue (under the
> subject line "Changes to LaTeX" here.
I believe it suffices to just load the menukeys package. In case that
doesn't do it, here is a somewhat lar
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 07:44:59AM +0200, Yuriy Skalko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After reviewing recent Russian translation of Additional.lyx manual, I've
> done some updates to English version.
Please go on. Pavel
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 08:47:23AM +0200, Yuriy Skalko wrote:
> Next 3 patches.
Looks good. Pavel
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Scott,
please let me have a MWE, as I reported the menukeys issue (under the
subject line "Changes to LaTeX" here.
el
On 28/10/2020 23:16, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
[...]
> To reproduce the error I only need to use the seminar class. I sent an
> email to the maintainer. I'll report back when I hear
Le 29/10/2020 à 01:26, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
On 10/28/20 8:15 PM, Jean-Pierre wrote:
Le 26 octobre 2020 21:57:09 Richard Kimberly Heck a
écrit :
OK, so, another set of tarballs is at
http://ftp.lyx.org/ftp/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/. Please let me know if
that these are good to go (hope
20 matches
Mail list logo
