On 2020-10-13 00:24, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 10/12/20 4:58 AM, Daniel wrote:
I have just played a bit with Edit > Manage Counter Values. It's a
nice feature to have available. However, it was not what I expected at
first. It seems to be "just" a counter inset which sets the counter at
th
On 10/10/20 6:24 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 06:12:01PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> On 10/9/20 5:34 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 09:57:00PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> Implementation-wise it could be just variant of page-break inse
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 00:11, Richard Kimberly Heck
wrote:
> On 10/12/20 5:33 PM, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
> When running LyX on Windows, it first tries to use py -3 and py -2 to
> determine the version of the available version of Python. However, on my
> machine, none of these is
On 10/12/20 4:58 AM, Daniel wrote:
> I have just played a bit with Edit > Manage Counter Values. It's a
> nice feature to have available. However, it was not what I expected at
> first. It seems to be "just" a counter inset which sets the counter at
> the place where it is inserted (which becomes c
On 10/12/20 5:33 PM, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> When running LyX on Windows, it first tries to use py -3 and py -2 to
> determine the version of the available version of Python. However, on
> my machine, none of these is available, so that I get warning messages:
>
> D:\LyX\lyx-unstab
Dear list,
When running LyX on Windows, it first tries to use py -3 and py -2 to
determine the version of the available version of Python. However, on my
machine, none of these is available, so that I get warning messages:
D:\LyX\lyx-unstable\cmake-build-debug\bin\LyX.exe
RunCommand:: could not t
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:38:33PM +0300, Yuriy Skalko wrote:
> > I propose to apply only changes to headers for now. I will
> > try to revive my old scripts which will try to remove unnecessary
> > includes in headers first. Only then we look on .cpp files.
>
> So, if I remove include changing in
> I propose to apply only changes to headers for now. I will
> try to revive my old scripts which will try to remove unnecessary
> includes in headers first. Only then we look on .cpp files.
So, if I remove include changing in .cpp from patch, then it can be
committed for now?
Yuriy
--
lyx-devel
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 10:36:36PM +0300, Yuriy Skalko wrote:
> > Getting rid of unnecessary includes is a valuable goal.
> > There are two things to keep in mind:
> > - One should try to get rid of redundant includes from headers first, only
> > after that reducing .cpp files (otherwise the check
> Getting rid of unnecessary includes is a valuable goal.
> There are two things to keep in mind:
> - One should try to get rid of redundant includes from headers first, only
> after that reducing .cpp files (otherwise the check of .h files becomes more
> tricky).
> - some generic headers were in
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 05:26:03PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 12/10/2020 ?? 15:51, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> >Getting rid of unnecessary includes is a valuable goal.
> >There are two things to keep in mind:
> >- One should try to get rid of redundant includes from headers first, only
>
Le 12/10/2020 à 15:51, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Getting rid of unnecessary includes is a valuable goal.
There are two things to keep in mind:
- One should try to get rid of redundant includes from headers first, only
after that reducing .cpp files (otherwise the check of .h files becomes more
tric
Le 12/10/2020 à 15:51, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 03:33:45PM +0300, Yuriy Skalko wrote:
The 1-3 patches look fine.
They are in now.
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 03:33:45PM +0300, Yuriy Skalko wrote:
The 1-3 patches look fine.
> From 7081d5c9f2e441fdce68d672fd07da6f1c121bfc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Yuriy Skalko
> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:30:07 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] Remove unused forward declarations and header incl
I've continued with refactoring of LyX codebase. Here are my new patches.
Yuriy
From 942ddea047c807b1f0fed82f089847be6543ddaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuriy Skalko
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 18:50:24 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Constify
---
src/Counters.cpp| 2 +-
src/Counters.
On 2020-10-12 11:11, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 12/10/2020 à 11:06, Daniel a écrit :
In case I have managed to correctly revert a change (first time), it
did not make any difference to the warning. I am not sure which change
triggered it then. Or maybe I need to update/change something else
Le 12/10/2020 à 11:06, Daniel a écrit :
In case I have managed to correctly revert a change (first time), it did
not make any difference to the warning. I am not sure which change
triggered it then. Or maybe I need to update/change something else for
it to take effect?
Did you run ./autogen.s
On 2020-10-09 12:18, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[reply on lyx-devel, since this is not something I 100% understand]
Le 08/10/2020 à 09:32, racoon a écrit :
I am getting lots of
warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-deprecated-copy'; did you mean
'-Wno-deprecated'?
[-Wunknown-warning-op
I have just played a bit with Edit > Manage Counter Values. It's a nice
feature to have available. However, it was not what I expected at first.
It seems to be "just" a counter inset which sets the counter at the
place where it is inserted (which becomes clear when looking at the
code). I think
19 matches
Mail list logo
