On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 05:08:26AM +0200, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
> commit 1a054e45711f30dfdf197a4d2ead4b3365318208
> Author: Thibaut Cuvelier
> Date: Wed Oct 7 05:33:56 2020 +0200
>
> DocBook: restore the old DocBook support.
> ---
> lib/layouts/db_stdclass.inc| 39 +
Le 7 octobre 2020 02:32:06 GMT+02:00, Richard Kimberly Heck
a écrit : InsetTableCell::InsetTableCell(InsetTableCell const & in) = default;
>>
>>
>> Or I am in the wrong standard?
>>
>I think this must be the magic JMarc was looking for. This is in C++11,
>so OK for us, right?
I like it!
JMarc
The attached example compiles to different PDF display with master than
with 2.3.x (notice the difference in spacing between the two lines).
The difference (between 2.3.x and master) goes away if the LyX note is
removed. The difference in LaTeX output appears to be due to a missing
\par.
Scott
On 10/6/20 8:18 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> On Monday, October 5, 2020 6:27:15 PM WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>
> > I'm actually not sure why the assignment operator is made unavailable,
>
> > but attached is a suitable patch, I think.
>
> >
>
> > Riki
>
>
> Is not your patch like:
>
>
>
On Monday, October 5, 2020 6:27:15 PM WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> I'm actually not sure why the assignment operator is made unavailable,
> but attached is a suitable patch, I think.
>
> Riki
Is not your patch like:
InsetTableCell::InsetTableCell(InsetTableCell const & in) = default;
Or
On 10/6/20 3:06 PM, Marco Morandini wrote:
> First of all, apologize if this is the wrong mailing list;
> should this be the case, please let me know who I should contact.
>
> I've been following lyx, as a user, since forever.
> I prefer to stay on the stable branch, and build it from source.
>
> R
On 10/6/20 5:29 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 11:04:55PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Le 05/10/2020 ?? 19:27, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
PS: yes, a proper fix will be eventually required, but I do not really
know what we should do.
>>> I'm actually not sur
First of all, apologize if this is the wrong mailing list;
should this be the case, please let me know who I should contact.
I've been following lyx, as a user, since forever.
I prefer to stay on the stable branch, and build it from source.
Recently I was unable to update the branch with git pull
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 11:04:55PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 05/10/2020 ?? 19:27, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
> >>PS: yes, a proper fix will be eventually required, but I do not really
> >>know what we should do.
> >
> >I'm actually not sure why the assignment operator is made una
Le 05/10/2020 à 19:27, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
PS: yes, a proper fix will be eventually required, but I do not really
know what we should do.
I'm actually not sure why the assignment operator is made unavailable,
but attached is a suitable patch, I think.
It looks reasonable, but I re
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 08:14:08AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 02:54:04PM +0200, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
> > > Looking at the news wiki I find the current separation on
> > >
> > > New features brought by the new file format vs General improvements
> > >
> > > to be way too
11 matches
Mail list logo