On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 08:56:48AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 03.10.2020, 08:18 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> > > > We can probably omit the mark if the ref is in the same non-
> > > > outputting
> > > > context (or generally if it is in a non-outputting context
> > it
On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 08:18:06AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 02.10.2020, 16:09 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 08:35:16AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > > Am Donnerstag, den 01.10.2020, 17:21 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > > Starting w
> And now clang++ 10 complains a lot...
>
> JMarc
This should fix it. I assume there will be more places...
Yuriy
From dd855c31bcb983ab533d1002ab7515b74ab4b290 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuriy Skalko
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 15:42:14 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Amend efc0877f
---
src/frontends/qt
Le 03/10/2020 à 13:19, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 02/10/2020 à 19:53, Yuriy Skalko a écrit :
Here is an updated patch.
Yes, there are more places to add the `override`. I'll try to change the
rest on the second step. Is it OK to commit the patch in its current
state?
Thanks a lot. It
Le 02/10/2020 à 20:05, Yuriy Skalko a écrit :
I've done some refactorings based on suggestions from cppcheck analyzer.
Thanks, it is in.
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Le 02/10/2020 à 19:53, Yuriy Skalko a écrit :
Here is an updated patch.
Yes, there are more places to add the `override`. I'll try to change the
rest on the second step. Is it OK to commit the patch in its current state?
Thanks a lot. It is in now.
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@li
