Re: New 2.3.5-1 Tarballs

2020-06-04 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2020, 16:19 +0200 schrieb Marco Atzeri: > usually upstream 2.3.5-1 is a bad idea > > as we use the dash to separate upstream from downstream release I see. I withdraw my suggestion, then. Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- lyx

Re: Patches to improve compatibility with modern C++ standard

2020-06-04 Thread Yu Jin
Am Do., 4. Juni 2020 um 15:22 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Thu, 4 Jun 2020 15:03:28 +0200 > schrieb Yu Jin : > > > Sorry for the trouble, I just updated Visual Studio to version 16.6.1 > > (always try to work with the latest software). My MVSC version according > to > > CMake is now 1926, and n

Re: New 2.3.5-1 Tarballs

2020-06-04 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 6/4/20 10:43 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 04/06/2020 à 16:38, Pavel Sanda a écrit : >> On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 04:19:45PM +0200, Marco Atzeri wrote: >>> On 04.06.2020 16:03, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2020, 08:38 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin: > I am not sure abou

Re: New 2.3.5-1 Tarballs

2020-06-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 04/06/2020 à 16:38, Pavel Sanda a écrit : On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 04:19:45PM +0200, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 04.06.2020 16:03, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2020, 08:38 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin: I am not sure about the LyX version in these tarballs. IMHO it should and up in

Re: New 2.3.5-1 Tarballs

2020-06-04 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 04:19:45PM +0200, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 04.06.2020 16:03, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > >Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2020, 08:38 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin: > >>I am not sure about the LyX version in these tarballs. > > > >IMHO it should and up in 2.3.5-1, not 2.3.5.1. > > usually

Re: New 2.3.5-1 Tarballs

2020-06-04 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 04.06.2020 16:03, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2020, 08:38 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin: I am not sure about the LyX version in these tarballs. IMHO it should and up in 2.3.5-1, not 2.3.5.1. usually upstream 2.3.5-1 is a bad idea as we use the dash to separate upstream from

Re: New 2.3.5-1 Tarballs

2020-06-04 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2020, 08:38 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin: > I am not sure about the LyX version in these tarballs. IMHO it should and up in 2.3.5-1, not 2.3.5.1. > Please find attached what a screenshot of lyx.rc says to me. In any case, the Legal Copyright date is utterly off ("1995-2011 LyX T

Re: New 2.3.5-1 Tarballs

2020-06-04 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 6/4/20 2:38 AM, Yu Jin wrote: > Am Mi., 3. Juni 2020 um 23:17 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > mailto:rikih...@lyx.org>>: > > Because of my screwup with the date and some missing example > files, we need to rebuild the binaries from new tarballs. I > decided to go ahead and rename

Re: Patches to improve compatibility with modern C++ standard

2020-06-04 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Thu, 4 Jun 2020 15:03:28 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin : > Am Di., 5. Mai 2020 um 13:49 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > Am Tue, 5 May 2020 13:39:35 +0200 > > schrieb Yu Jin : > > > > > Am Di., 5. Mai 2020 um 13:10 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > > > > Am Tue, 5 May 2020 12:36:03 +0200 > > > > schri

Re: Patches to improve compatibility with modern C++ standard

2020-06-04 Thread Yu Jin
Am Di., 5. Mai 2020 um 13:49 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Tue, 5 May 2020 13:39:35 +0200 > schrieb Yu Jin : > > > Am Di., 5. Mai 2020 um 13:10 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > > Am Tue, 5 May 2020 12:36:03 +0200 > > > schrieb Yu Jin : > > > > > > > Am Di., 5. Mai 2020 um 09:16 Uhr schrieb Kor

Re: Date Wrong in Tarballs [Re: [LyX/2.3.x] Prepare for 2.3.5]

2020-06-04 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Wed, 3 Jun 2020 17:05:58 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > >> Re-packaging needed also because of missing some example files in cmake > >> build :( > > Do we know why? Feel free to commit a patch if you can. > > Whoops, saw you did. Thanks! > > Riki Yes, sorry for not asking befor