On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 08:36:53PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> The logic in RandomAccessList is overly
> complicated (and inefficient) and I'm working on simplifying it by using
> a splice instead of all of those swaps.
The attached patch implements the splice approach. I've tested the patch
On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 07:08:50PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 2/1/20 12:40 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > I've been working on a patch for LFUN_PARAGRAPH_MOVE_DOWN move subitems
> > of an item along with the item. For example, consider the following
> > situation:
> >
> > 1. One ite
On 2/1/20 12:40 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I've been working on a patch for LFUN_PARAGRAPH_MOVE_DOWN move subitems
> of an item along with the item. For example, consider the following
> situation:
>
> 1. One item
> a. "subitem"
> 2. Another item
>
> Currently (i.e., without the patch),
On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 08:43:15PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 01/02/2020 à 18:40, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > I've been working on a patch for LFUN_PARAGRAPH_MOVE_DOWN move subitems
> > of an item along with the item. For example, consider the following
> > situation:
> >
> >1.
On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 08:41:12PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 01/02/2020 à 18:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > What would the consequences be of the attached patch?
> >
> > From what I understand, finishUndo() is meant for when there have been
> > som undos of type INSERT or DELETE
