I have managed to created two prototypes both extending LyX to include some
scientific IDE features. One uses pure C++ and the other uses PySide2. From
a ease of compile standpoint, the c++ one is better to integrate since the
other one, if chosen would most likely to include another python
interpr
Let me check again. I have been working on another larger extension these
days.
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 1:22 PM Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 25.06.2019 um 18:33 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
> >
> > Can we get this tested on MacOS?
>
> I’ve tried to paste the snippet into the TocWidget.cpp …
> I h
Am 25.06.2019 um 18:33 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
>
> Can we get this tested on MacOS?
I’ve tried to paste the snippet into the TocWidget.cpp …
I had to change the TocWidget.h too, then it compiles.
But I cannot see the improvement in behavior. I’m on master.
Stephan
>
> On 6/19/19 4:52
Le 28/06/2019 à 18:31, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Am Freitag, 28. Juni 2019, 16:31:49 CEST schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Now the search is logarithmic, search-time = O(log(n)). Still too much.
What would be a typical search that is slow? Just search a word in the
UserGuide? Or do regexs need to b
