Re: New Win installer ready for LyX 2.3.0

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:48:43PM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 22.03.2018 um 06:34 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > Thank you for this detailed explanation. It's unfortunate that we have > > this disagreement on what is best for the users, but I appreciate that > > you have put a lot of thought int

Re: New Win installer ready for LyX 2.3.0

Am 22.03.2018 um 06:34 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Thank you for this detailed explanation. It's unfortunate that we have this disagreement on what is best for the users, but I appreciate that you have put a lot of thought into your decision and I know that you care a lot about the users. Don't g

Re: [LyX/master] esint10: attempt on to fix empty symbol glyphs.

Am 22.03.2018 um 10:41 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > > Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 22.03.2018 um 02:57 schrieb Pavel Sanda : >>> >>> Pavel Sanda wrote: commit 92680495bb8dcdcb5daf4a0c2ed9bdf9da7894f1 Author: Pavel Sanda Date: Thu Mar 22 02:26:46 2018 +0100 esint10: attempt

Re: [LyX/master] esint10: attempt on to fix empty symbol glyphs.

Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 22.03.2018 um 02:57 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > > > > Pavel Sanda wrote: > >> commit 92680495bb8dcdcb5daf4a0c2ed9bdf9da7894f1 > >> Author: Pavel Sanda > >> Date: Thu Mar 22 02:26:46 2018 +0100 > >> > >>esint10: attempt on to fix empty symbol glyphs. > >> > >>With

Re: [LyX/master] esint10: attempt on to fix empty symbol glyphs.

Am 22.03.2018 um 02:57 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > > Pavel Sanda wrote: >> commit 92680495bb8dcdcb5daf4a0c2ed9bdf9da7894f1 >> Author: Pavel Sanda >> Date: Thu Mar 22 02:26:46 2018 +0100 >> >>esint10: attempt on to fix empty symbol glyphs. >> >>With advent of qt5 glyphs on codepoints 10, 1