On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:23:52AM +, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > Haha! Yeah, we should announce that users shouldn't be surprised if LyX
> > > gets some lengths wrongs because its allowed to drink now!
> >
> > Yeah, it might occassionally black out as well.
>
> :)) Espe
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Haha! Yeah, we should announce that users shouldn't be surprised if LyX
> > gets some lengths wrongs because its allowed to drink now!
>
> Yeah, it might occassionally black out as well.
:)) Especially with new painting stuff on Mac (Apple Vodka flavors). P
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:48:59PM +, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > Aren't we supposed to celebrate rounded years or something like that?
> >
> > Try to go into a bar in the U.S. when you are 20.51 years old and order
> > a drink :)
>
> Haha! Yeah, we should announce that
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Aren't we supposed to celebrate rounded years or something like that?
>
> Try to go into a bar in the U.S. when you are 20.51 years old and order
> a drink :)
Haha! Yeah, we should announce that users shouldn't be surprised if LyX
gets some lengths wrongs because its al
On 2018-02-23, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 09:42:07AM +, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Le 12/01/2018 à 23:28, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>> > I'm not sure what the desired behavior is. Perhaps if the selection
>> > c
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 09:32:24AM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Friday, 23 February 2018 03.34.52 WET Joel Kulesza wrote:
> > Minor wording question here and on the website: is "down" potentially
> > confusing for a non-native English speaker? Would "unavailable" be more
> > clear?
>
> In
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:10:38AM +, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > -The 2.3 series has a rich set of new features compared to the current
> > > stable
> > > -series. An overview of the new features can be found here:
> > > +With this release, LyX celebrates 22 years of exi
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 01:03:52PM +, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > I propose that we drop the '*' modification flag and let only the warning
> > about external modification. That way one can easily see whether there is
> > merge problem because file got edited meanwhile or just reload is enough.
>
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 09:42:07AM +, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 12/01/2018 à 23:28, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > I'm not sure what the desired behavior is. Perhaps if the selection
> > contains insets of a certain type (e.g. a float), the LFUN should just
> > abort with a relevant mess
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:21:19AM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 23.02.2018 um 04:03 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> > Uwe, I included the same note that we did for 2.2.0, mentioning that if you
> > installed a pre-release, you should uninstall those versions. Is this
> > still the correct note?
>
>
Am Freitag, 23. Februar 2018 13:48:26 CET schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> Hi,
>
> I see new behaviour when .lyx is externally modified while being loaded in
> lyx. It is automatically flagged as modified no matter whether the file was
> modified inside lyx before external modification.
>
> This typically
Kornel Benko wrote:
> > There are corner cases which I do not understand either and I always
> > thought that is has smt to do with the unusual .in.in -> .in
> > makefile cascade. But this particular case does not seem mysterious
> > to me. Clean tree does not have lyx.pot and makefile wants to hav
Hi,
I see new behaviour when .lyx is externally modified while being loaded in lyx.
It is automatically flagged as modified no matter whether the file was modified
inside lyx before external modification.
This typically happens when (r)syncing file between computers. I used to know
when
sync hap
Le 23/02/2018 à 12:00, Kornel Benko a écrit :
That does still not explain the recreation of .po files.
Cmake build creates everything in the build-tree only.
Only if desired (e.g. with targets 'layouttranslation1' or 'update-gmo') also
the source tree is affected. And here only the really changed
Am Freitag, 23. Februar 2018 11:24:17 CET schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > There is something mysterious and really annoying in the reasons why
> > autotools decide that po/gmo files should be rebuilt. Sometimes it does
> > not
> > make sense.
> >
> > Do you have hints?
>
>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> There is something mysterious and really annoying in the reasons why
> autotools decide that po/gmo files should be rebuilt. Sometimes it does not
> make sense.
>
> Do you have hints?
There are corner cases which I do not understand either and I always
thought that
Am 23.02.2018 um 04:03 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
Uwe, I included the same note that we did for 2.2.0, mentioning that if you
installed a pre-release, you should uninstall those versions. Is this
still the correct note?
Yes, this is still correct.
My experience is that some users e.g. only teste
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > -The 2.3 series has a rich set of new features compared to the current
> > stable
> > -series. An overview of the new features can be found here:
> > +With this release, LyX celebrates 22 years of existence. The 2.3 series
>
> How many years of existence are we celebrat
Le 23/02/2018 à 10:39, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Yes, it is from a clean tree.
That's why :)
There is something mysterious and really annoying in the reasons why
autotools decide that po/gmo files should be rebuilt. Sometimes it does
not make sense.
Do you have hints?
Le 12/01/2018 à 23:28, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I don't imagine any user actually does this, but if I select all and do
ctrl+m, LyX often has problems (e.g. my RAM goes from 1GB to my max of
8GB). I've found this with Embedded Objects and with User Guide.
Yes, I can imagine that the result is
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Yes, it is from a clean tree.
That's why :)
Pavel
Le 15/02/2018 à 16:54, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 15 février 2018 16:32:23 GMT+01:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
a écrit :
I can try to prepare that. What character you want me to paste there?
I can't take 'f' from esint, there is no 'f' included. Pavel
The integral at
On Friday, 23 February 2018 03.34.52 WET Joel Kulesza wrote:
> Minor wording question here and on the website: is "down" potentially
> confusing for a non-native English speaker? Would "unavailable" be more
> clear?
In the case of (European) Portuguese the equivalent of down is the word that we
Am Donnerstag, 22. Februar 2018 18:49:42 CET schrieb Scott Kostyshak
:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:13:17PM +, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Which one? Free* does not work here. And Scott uses TL2016.
>
> It works for me also on my system with TL 2017 (but it is not
> up-to-date). I will update tha
24 matches
Mail list logo
