On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:49:26AM +, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 01.10.2017 um 00:03 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Qt 5.6.3 was released a week ago [1]. Do you agree that it makes sense
> > to go forward with 5.6.3 for the LyX 2.3.0 rc1 and final releases for
> > the Mac a
At present a copier is triggered when a document is exported, yet my
pattern of work tends to be: view the pdf, and then save a copy from the
pdf viewer (Sumatra in my case). I recall reading on this list earlier
in the year I think it was Scott describing the same work flow. The easy
accessib
> Am 04.10.2017 um 23:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
> Le 04/10/17 à 22:40, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> These are the events printed in terminal window:
>>
>> Start LyX
>> Error: New binding for 'Kontroll-T 1' is overriding old binding...
>> Error: New binding for 'Kontroll-T 2' is overriding
Le 04/10/17 à 20:09, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
Sorry. I didn't notice that you were talking about 2.2.x. Yes, you are
probably right.
Richard, is the attached patch Ok?
Actually, the patch does not change my situation. It seems that this
ancient gcc does not know about __thread.
However,
Le 04/10/17 à 22:40, Stephan Witt a écrit :
These are the events printed in terminal window:
Start LyX
Error: New binding for 'Kontroll-T 1' is overriding old binding...
Error: New binding for 'Kontroll-T 2' is overriding old binding...
Error: New binding for 'Kontroll-T O' is overriding old bin
Am 04.10.2017 um 15:30 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
> Le 03/10/2017 à 21:32, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
>> So there are some situations where LyX tries to make a minimal redraw
>> because ut thinks that the screen is still correct, although Qt actually
>> wiped it out. We have to find a
Am 04.10.2017 um 20:24 schrieb Enrico Forestieri :
>
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:14:31PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 04.10.2017 um 20:09 schrieb Enrico Forestieri :
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 07:45:25PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 10:19:52PM +0200, Jean
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:14:31PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 04.10.2017 um 20:09 schrieb Enrico Forestieri :
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 07:45:25PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 10:19:52PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>> I get:
> >>>
> >>> ../../s
Am 04.10.2017 um 20:09 schrieb Enrico Forestieri :
>
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 07:45:25PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 10:19:52PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> I get:
>>>
>>> ../../stable/src/Paragraph.cpp: In member function ‘void
>>> lyx::Paragraph::latex(
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 07:45:25PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 10:19:52PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > I get:
> >
> > ../../stable/src/Paragraph.cpp: In member function ‘void
> > lyx::Paragraph::latex(const lyx::BufferParams&, const lyx::Font&,
> > lyx::otex
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 10:19:52PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I get:
>
> ../../stable/src/Paragraph.cpp: In member function ‘void
> lyx::Paragraph::latex(const lyx::BufferParams&, const lyx::Font&,
> lyx::otexstream&, const lyx::OutputParams&, int, int, bool) const’:
> ../../stable/src/P
Le 03/10/2017 à 21:32, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
So there are some situations where LyX tries to make a minimal redraw
because ut thinks that the screen is still correct, although Qt actually
wiped it out. We have to find a way to detect these cases.
Could you try the following debug patc
12 matches
Mail list logo
